SUN NATIONAL BANK v. SEAFORD SPECIALTY SURGERY CENTER, LLC et al
Filing
62
ORDERED that Pltf's 57 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Pltf may re-file its motion following the clerk's entry of default. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 3/26/2015. (dmr)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
(Doc. No. 57)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
CAMDEN VICINAGE
___________________________________
:
:
SUN NATIONAL BANK,
:
Plaintiff,
:
: Civil No. 13-5800 (RBK/KMW)
v.
:
: ORDER
SEAFORD SPECIALTY SURGERY
:
CENTER, LLC, et al.
:
:
Defendants.
:
___________________________________ :
KUGLER, United States District Judge:
THIS MATTER having come before the Court upon Plaintiff Sun National Bank’s
(“Plaintiff”) motion for default judgments against Defendants Seaford Specialty Surgery Center,
LLC and Medical Consulting Group Ambulatory Surgery Centers, LLC, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 55 (Doc. No. 57); and
IT APPEARING TO THE COURT that Plaintiff has not sought an entry of default
from the clerk of court, nor has the clerk of court entered default; and
THE COURT NOTING that a party seeking relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 must obtain
an entry of default from the clerk of court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) as a precondition to
obtaining a default judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b), see DeTore v. Local No. 245 of Jersey
City Pub. Emps. Union, 511 F. Supp. 171, 176 (D.N.J. 1981); Husain v. Casino Control
Comm’n, 265 Fed. App’x 130, 133 (3d Cir. 2008) (“[E]ntry of default by the Clerk under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) constitutes a general prerequisite for a subsequent default
judgment under Rule 55(b)”);
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may re-file its motion following the clerk’s entry of
default.
Dated:
3/26/2015
s/ Robert B. Kugler
ROBERT B. KUGLER
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?