FERRANTI v. DIXON
Filing
24
ORDER vacating the entry of default against Defendant Joseph Dixon; denying Pltf's 22 Motion for Default Judgment; denying w/out prejudice Deft's 20 Motion to Dismiss; directing Deft to file a procedurally appropriate responsive pleading by 10/26/2015. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 10/6/2015. (drw)n.m.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
___________________________________
:
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
JOSEPH DIXON,
:
:
Defendant.
:
___________________________________:
JACK FERRANTI,
Civ. No. 14-3331 (NLH)
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion,
IT IS on this
6th
day of
October
, 2015,
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91
S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) against Defendant will not be
dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; and it is further
ORDERED that the entry of default against Defendant Joseph
Dixon will be vacated; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF
No. 22) is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the
alternative, for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20) is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
Defendant may refile his motions as separate,
procedurally appropriate filings; and it is further
ORDERED that Defendant shall file and serve a procedurally
appropriate responsive pleading no later than October 26, 2015;
it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of
this Order upon Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail.
At Camden, New Jersey
___s/ Noel L. Hillman_____
NOEL L. HILLMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?