FERRANTI v. DIXON

Filing 24

ORDER vacating the entry of default against Defendant Joseph Dixon; denying Pltf's 22 Motion for Default Judgment; denying w/out prejudice Deft's 20 Motion to Dismiss; directing Deft to file a procedurally appropriate responsive pleading by 10/26/2015. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 10/6/2015. (drw)n.m.

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ___________________________________ : : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : JOSEPH DIXON, : : Defendant. : ___________________________________: JACK FERRANTI, Civ. No. 14-3331 (NLH) ORDER For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS on this 6th day of October , 2015, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) against Defendant will not be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; and it is further ORDERED that the entry of default against Defendant Joseph Dixon will be vacated; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 22) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant may refile his motions as separate, procedurally appropriate filings; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant shall file and serve a procedurally appropriate responsive pleading no later than October 26, 2015; it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail. At Camden, New Jersey ___s/ Noel L. Hillman_____ NOEL L. HILLMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?