EINHORN v. SCOTT MARTIN LANDSCAPING
Filing
6
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 5 Motion for Default Judgment. ORDERED that a monetary judgment is hereby AWARDED to Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $14,703.00. ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to CLOSE THIS FILE. Signed by Judge Joseph E. Irenas on 3/12/2015. (TH, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
WILLIAM J. EINHORN,
Administrator of Teamsters
Health & Welfare Trust Fund of
Philadelphia & Vicinity and
Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of
Philadelphia & Vicinity,
Plaintiff,
HONORABLE JOSEPH E. IRENAS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-5219
(JEI/KMW)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 5)
v.
SCOTT MARTIN LANDSCAPING,
Defendant.
APPEARANCES:
MARKOWITZ & RICHMAN
R. Matthew Pettigrew, Jr.
123 South Broad Street
Suite 2020
Philadelphia, PA 19109
Counsel for Plaintiff
IRENAS, Senior District Judge:
This matter having appeared before the Court upon
Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Dkt. No. 5);
the Court having reviewed the motion; and it appearing that:
1.
Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund of Philadelphia and
Vicinity and Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and
Vicinity (“the Funds”) are trust funds established within the
meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 186(c)(5), and “multiemployer plans” and
1
“employee benefit plans” within the meaning of 29 U.S.C.
§§ 1002(3) and (37).
2.
Plaintiff William J. Einhorn is an administrator and
fiduciary in respect to the Funds within the meaning of 29
U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), who is authorized to bring this action on
behalf of all Trustees of the Fund.
3.
Defendant, Scott Martin Landscaping, is a Pennsylvania
business entity with a place of business at 100 Palace Court,
Chalfont, Pennsylvania, 18914.
4.
According to the Complaint, Defendant is a signatory
to a Collective Bargaining Agreement (“the Agreement”).
Under
the terms of the Agreement, Defendant is required to make
contributions to the Funds.
5.
Plaintiff alleges that Defendant violated the
Agreement by failing to pay contributions for the years 2012 and
2013.
Plaintiff commenced this action on August 20, 2014, by
filing a Complaint and issuing a Summons.
6.
(Dkt. Nos. 1 & 2)
Defendant was served a copy of the Summons and
Complaint on August 22, 2014.
(Dkt. No. 3)
Defendant failed to
file a responsive pleading to the Complaint pursuant to the
Rules.
2
7.
On September 26, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Request to
the Clerk to Enter a Default Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 55(a).
(Dkt. No. 4)
September 26, 2014.
The Clerk entered a Default on
Plaintiffs moved for judgment by default
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2) on October 14, 2014.
5)
(Dkt. No.
To date, Defendant has not made any attempt to contest the
Motion for Default or respond in any way to the Summons and
Complaint.
8.
Plaintiff has provided itemized statements listing all
delinquent contributions, attorney’s fees, and costs.
(Pettigrew Decl. ¶¶ 10-12, Ex. A)
According to these
statements, Plaintiff is entitled to $11,658.00 in unpaid
benefit contributions, $2,610.00 in attorney’s fees, and $435.00
in litigation costs.
9.
10.
(Id. ¶ 15)
In total, Defendant owes Plaintiff $14,703.00.
For the reasons given above, the Court will Grant
Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment.
And for good
cause shown;
IT IS on this 12th day of March, 2015,
ORDERED THAT:
(1)
Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment is
hereby GRANTED;
3
(2)
Monetary judgment is hereby AWARDED to Plaintiff and
against Defendant in the amount of $14,703.00;
(3)
Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order and
accompanying Judgment on Defendant within seven (7)
days;
(4)
This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Order
until the expiration of one year from the date hereof
or such later date as may be ordered by the Court on
motion of any party;
(5)
The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to CLOSE THIS
FILE.
s/ Joseph E. Irenas
.
Joseph E. Irenas, S.U.S.D.J.
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?