GORDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, ORDERED that respondent's request for an extension of time to file an answer to the amended 2255 motion 16 is granted; ORDERED that respondent shall file and serve its answer on or before 8/21/2015. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 8/3/2015. (dmr)(n.m.)

Download PDF
UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JAVON GORDON, Petitioner, Civ. No. 14-6760 (RBK) v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an amended motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On May 4, 2015, this Court ordered respondent to answer the amended§ 2255 motion within forty-five days. On July 27, 2015, having received nothing from respondent on the record in response to the order to answer within the forty-five day period, this Court issued an order to show cause on respondent why the amended§ 2255 motion should not be granted. On July 30, 2015, respondent submitted a letter in response to the order to show cause. Respondent apologizes for missing the deadline and states that the Assistant United States Attorneys assigned to this case have been engaged in other matters. Nevertheless, respondent admits that it should have requested additional time from the Court to file a response but failed to do so. Respondent now requests an extension of time until August 21, 2015 to file its response to the amended§ 2255 motion. Good cause being shown, the Court will grant the request. ~ Accordingly, IT IS this}__ day of Q~ , 2015, ORDERED that respondent's request for an extension of time to file an answer to the amended§ 2255 motion (Dkt. No. 16.) is granted; and it is further 1 ORDERED that respondent shall file and serve its answer on or before August 21, 2015; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Order on petitioner by regular U.S. mail. ~/)~ ROBERT B. KUGLER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?