REARDON v. SEGAL et al

Filing 93

ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall REOPEN the case; Plaintiff's motion for entry of Default 92 is DENIED; Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 9/7/2018. (tf, n.m.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JOHN E REARDON, HONORABLE JEROME B. SIMANDLE Plaintiff, Civil Action 15-244 (JBS-JS) v. ORDER VINCENT SEGAL, et al., Defendants. Whereas, on September 6, 2018, the Court dismissed the Complaint in this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) [Docket Items 90 & 91] and the Clerk of Court closed this case upon the docket, while on September 7, 2018, the Clerk of Court received by mail a motion for entry of Default by Plaintiff John E. Reardon [Docket Item 92] that had been dated September 4, 2018 [see Docket Item 92-1 at p.1]; the Court again finding that Plaintiff has not made personal service of the summons and Complaint upon any Defendant in the manner required by the applicable rules, and that no Defendant is in default, as previously spelled out to Mr. Reardon in detail in this Court’s Order of June 27, 2018 [Docket Item 78]; and for good cause shown; IT IS this 7th day of September , 2018 hereby ORDERED that Clerk of Court shall REOPEN the case upon the docket; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for entry of Default [Docket Item 92] shall be, and hereby is, DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case upon the docket. s/ Jerome B. Simandle JEROME B. SIMANDLE U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?