REARDON v. SEGAL et al
Filing
93
ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall REOPEN the case; Plaintiff's motion for entry of Default 92 is DENIED; Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 9/7/2018. (tf, n.m.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
JOHN E REARDON,
HONORABLE JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Plaintiff,
Civil Action
15-244 (JBS-JS)
v.
ORDER
VINCENT SEGAL, et al.,
Defendants.
Whereas, on September 6, 2018, the Court dismissed the
Complaint in this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(m) [Docket Items 90 & 91] and the Clerk of Court
closed this case upon the docket, while on September 7, 2018,
the Clerk of Court received by mail a motion for entry of
Default by Plaintiff John E. Reardon [Docket Item 92] that had
been dated September 4, 2018 [see Docket Item 92-1 at p.1]; the
Court again finding that Plaintiff has not made personal service
of the summons and Complaint upon any Defendant in the manner
required by the applicable rules, and that no Defendant is in
default, as previously spelled out to Mr. Reardon in detail in
this Court’s Order of June 27, 2018 [Docket Item 78]; and for
good cause shown;
IT IS this
7th
day of
September
, 2018 hereby
ORDERED that Clerk of Court shall REOPEN the case upon the
docket; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for entry of Default
[Docket Item 92] shall be, and hereby is, DENIED; and it is
further
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case upon
the docket.
s/ Jerome B. Simandle
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
U.S. District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?