DIRECTV, LLC, v. ALVAREZ
Filing
11
ORDER granting 8 Motion for Default Judgment; ORDERED that Pltf DIRECTV, LLC, shall recover of Deft RIGOBERTO ALVAREZ the sum of $34,323.25, etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 11/9/2016. (dmr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
CAMDEN VICINAGE
DIRECTV, LLC, a California limited
liability company,
ORDER ON MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.:1:15-CV-06827NLH-KMW
v.
RIGOBERTO ALVAREZ,
Individually, and d/b/a EL CHARRO,
Defendant.
The Summons and Complaint in this action having been duly served upon the
Defendant, RIGOBERTO ALVAREZ, Individually, and d/b/a EL CHARRO, on
October 21, 2015, and said Defendant having failed to plead or otherwise appear in
this action,
NOW, on motion of Wayne D. Lonstein, Esq., Lonstein Law Office, P.C.,
attorneys for the Plaintiff (Docket No. 8), it is hereby:
ORDERED that the Motion for Default Judgment on Count 1 be, and the
same hereby is
GRANTED; and it is further,
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that DIRECTV, LLC, the Plaintiff, shall
1
recover of Defendant as follows:
Against RIGOBERTO ALVAREZ, Individually, and d/b/a EL
CHARRO, as follows:
1)
Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II), the sum of TEN
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00); and
2)
Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii), the sum of TWENTY
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($20,000.00) for enhanced damages
for Defendant’s willful violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605(a); and
3)
Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(B)(iii), costs and attorneys’
fees of FOUR
THOUSAND, THREE
HUNDRED
TWENTY THREE DOLLARS AND TWENTY FIVE
CENTS ($4,323.25);
and it is further,
ORDERED that within 10 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall be,
and hereby is, directed to advise the Court how it wishes to proceed on the remaining
counts of the Complaint.
Dated: November 9, 2016
At Camden, New Jersey
s/ Noel L. Hillman
HON. NOEL L. HILLMAN
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?