Filing 11

ORDER granting 8 Motion for Default Judgment; ORDERED that Pltf DIRECTV, LLC, shall recover of Deft RIGOBERTO ALVAREZ the sum of $34,323.25, etc. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 11/9/2016. (dmr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE DIRECTV, LLC, a California limited liability company, ORDER ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Civil Action No.:1:15-CV-06827NLH-KMW v. RIGOBERTO ALVAREZ, Individually, and d/b/a EL CHARRO, Defendant. The Summons and Complaint in this action having been duly served upon the Defendant, RIGOBERTO ALVAREZ, Individually, and d/b/a EL CHARRO, on October 21, 2015, and said Defendant having failed to plead or otherwise appear in this action, NOW, on motion of Wayne D. Lonstein, Esq., Lonstein Law Office, P.C., attorneys for the Plaintiff (Docket No. 8), it is hereby: ORDERED that the Motion for Default Judgment on Count 1 be, and the same hereby is GRANTED; and it is further, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that DIRECTV, LLC, the Plaintiff, shall 1 recover of Defendant as follows: Against RIGOBERTO ALVAREZ, Individually, and d/b/a EL CHARRO, as follows: 1) Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II), the sum of TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00); and 2) Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii), the sum of TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($20,000.00) for enhanced damages for Defendant’s willful violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605(a); and 3) Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(B)(iii), costs and attorneys’ fees of FOUR THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED TWENTY THREE DOLLARS AND TWENTY FIVE CENTS ($4,323.25); and it is further, ORDERED that within 10 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall be, and hereby is, directed to advise the Court how it wishes to proceed on the remaining counts of the Complaint. Dated: November 9, 2016 At Camden, New Jersey s/ Noel L. Hillman HON. NOEL L. HILLMAN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?