MOLLEY v. DEBOSE et al
OPINION. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 10/27/2016. (dmr)(n.m.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
CHERYL DEBOSE, et al.,
Civ. No. 16-2297 (NLH)
Shar-rik Molley, # 243576
Atlantic County Justice Facility
5060 Atlantic Ave.
Mays Land, NJ 08330
Plaintiff Pro se
Plaintiff Shar-rik Molley, an inmate currently confined at
the Atlantic County Justice Facility in Mays Landing, New
Jersey, filed this civil rights action asserting claims pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Molley v. DeBose, No. 16-2297 (D.N.J. 2016)
(“Molley-III”), and requested to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF
Because this Court found Plaintiff’s in forma
pauperis application to be incomplete, this matter was
administratively terminated on September 13, 2016. (ECF Nos. 45.)
On or about September 26, 2016, Plaintiff submitted a
renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 6),
and the matter was reopened for review by a judicial officer.
On September 29, 2016, the Court entered an opinion and order
once again administratively terminating this matter because
Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application was still incomplete.
(ECF Nos. 7-8.)
More specifically, although Plaintiff’s account
statement was certified by a prison official, it failed to cover
the entire six-month period immediately preceding the filing of
(See Sept. 29, 2016 Opinion 4-5, ECF No. 7.)
On or about October 17, 2016, Plaintiff submitted another
in forma pauperis application.
(ECF No. 9.)
application is essentially identical to the application he
submitted on September 26th.
(ECF No. 6.)
Therefore, for the
reasons stated in the Court’s September 29th Opinion and Order
(ECF Nos. 7-8), Plaintiff’s renewed in forma pauperis
application will be denied.
Plaintiff will be granted leave to
apply to reopen within 45 days.
An appropriate Order follows.
Dated: October 27, 2016
At Camden, New Jersey
s/ Noel L. Hillman
NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?