PHILLIPS v. N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Granting 14 Motion to Seal Document. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 10/6/17. (js)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
CAMDEN VICINAGE
WADIS PHILLIPS,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Petitioner,
v.
N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD,
Respondent.
Civil No. 16-5446 (RMB)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ON MOTION TO SEAL
This matter comes before the Court upon Respondents’ Motion
to File Confidential Documents Under Seal Pursuant to L. Civ. R.
5.3 ((“Mot. to Seal”) (ECF No. 14.) Petitioner did not oppose
the motion.
On September 7, 2016, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ
of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the May
2014 decision of the New Jersey Parole Board, denying parole and
setting a ten-year future eligibility term.
Respondent
filed
an
Answer
to
the
(Pet., ECF No. 1.)
Petition,
relevant portions of the state court record.
including
the
(Answer, ECF No.
13.)
Respondent has requested that the Court file under seal
Petitioner’s
medical
presentence
summary,
a
investigation
psychological
report,
evaluation
dated
pre-parole
April
29,
2013,
a
confidential
memorandum
from
the
Essex
County
Prosecutor’s Office, a document entitled “Confidential Reports
Considered,”
dated
February
19,
2014,
and
a
confidential
addendum, dated June 5, 2014. (Declaration of Christopher C.
Josephson, ECF No. 14-1, ¶5.)
Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(2) and (3) requires the court to
consider, upon a motion to seal, (1) the nature of the materials
or proceedings at issue; (2) the legitimate private or public
interests
which
defined
and
sought
is
warrant
serious
not
the
injury
granted,
relief
that
and
sought;
would
(3)
(3)
result
why
a
if
the
clearly
the
relief
less
restrictive
are
Petitioner’s
alternative to relief is not available.
The
nature
of
the
materials
at
issue
presentence report, Petitioner’s medical records, and documents
discussing Petitioner’s medical records.
Under
New
Jersey
state
law,
confidential from third parties.
presentence
reports
are
State v. DeGeorge, 274 A.2d
593 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971).
The Supreme Court of New
Jersey has determined there is a public interest in maintaining
confidentiality
of
presentence
reports
from
State v. Kunz, 55 A.2d 895, 902 (N.J. 1969).
third
parties.
Respondent will
make a copy available to Petitioner upon his request, but the
report is otherwise confidential and no alternative is available
to sealing the presentence report.
2
Petitioner has an interest in the privacy of his medical
records.
Doe v. Delie, 257 F.3d 309, 315 (3d Cir. 2001) (“There
can be no question that ... medical records, which may contain
intimate facts of a personal nature, are well within the ambit
of materials entitled to privacy protection”) (quoting United
States v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 638 F.2d 570, 577 (3d Cir.
1980)).
Additionally,
the
State
has
enacted
legislation
prohibiting disclosure of an inmate’s mental health evaluations
to
an
inmate,
information
under
would
be
circumstances
harmful
to
where
the
the
inmate,
release
jeopardize
of
the
safety of others, compromise the privacy of others or have a
substantial impact on the orderly operation of the correctional
facility.
See N.J.A.C. 10A:22-2.7(d).
Therefore, both parties’
interests warrant sealing Petitioner’s medical records.
Petitioner’s right to medical privacy would be injured if
his
medical
docket.
records
The
are
State’s
publicly
interest
available
in
the
on
safe
the
Court’s
operation
of
correctional facilities is also compromised by disclosure of an
inmate’s mental health evaluation.
that
there
is
no
less
restrictive
Finally, the Court finds
alternative
to
sealing
Plaintiff’s medical records, and the documents discussing those
records.
IT IS therefore on this 6th day of October 2017;
3
ORDERED that the motion to seal (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED,
and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall maintain under
seal
the
confidential
documents
(Cra1-Cra33)
contained
in
Exhibit “B” to the Declaration of Christopher C. Josephson (ECF
No. 15); and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serve this Memorandum
and Order on Petitioner by regular mail.
s/Renée Marie Bumb
RENÉE MARIE BUMB
United States District Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?