HALL v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 12/28/2016. (tf, n.m.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
LAMONT M. HALL, JR.,
No. 16-7298 (JBS-AMD)
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL, ET AL.
SIMANDLE, Chief District Judge
On October 14, 2016, Plaintiff Lamont M. Hall, Jr.
submitted a civil complaint alleging violations of his
constitutional rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Mail sent to Plaintiff at his listed address was
returned as undeliverable on October 26, 2016. Docket Entry 2.
Local Civil Rule 10.1(a) requires unrepresented
parties to notify the Court of any change in address within 7
days. The Rule further provides that, failure to file such notice
“may result in the imposition of sanctions by the Court.” Id.
Indeed, failure to apprise the Court of an address change may
result in the outright dismissal of the case for failure to
proceed, or an administrative termination of the action without
prejudice. See, e.g., Boretsky v. Corzine, No. 08-2265, 2008 WL
2512916 (D.N.J. June 23, 2008); Allebach v. Cathell, No. 06-5005,
2009 WL 2147145 (D.N.J. July 15, 2009).
As the Court does not have a current address for
Plaintiff, the matter cannot proceed at this time. The Court
will therefore administratively terminate the proceedings
without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to reinstate this action
by notifying the Court of his new address within 30 days.
Failure to provide an updated address within 30 days
of the date of this Order may result in the matter being
dismissed for lack of prosecution.
An appropriate Order follows.
December 28, 2016
s/ Jerome B. Simandle
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Chief U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?