MANNING v. SAFELITE FULFILLMENT, INC. et al

Filing 86

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 79 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 8/11/2021. (rss, )

Download PDF
Case 1:17-cv-02824-RMB-MJS Document 86 Filed 08/11/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 2858 [Docket No. 79] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE GREG MANNING, Plaintiff, Civil No. 17-2824 (RMB/MJS) v. SAFELITE FULFILLMENT, INC. et. al., ORDER Defendants. This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants Nick Moran’s and Safelite Fulfillment, Inc.’s (“Defendants”) Objections [Docket No. 81] to Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Skahill’s Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 79.] For the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion of the same date IT IS on this 11th day of August 2021, hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Court finds no clear error in the unobjected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. Those portions of the report are ADOPTED; 2. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, with respect to Defendants’ Objections that Judge Skahill applied the incorrect legal standards or failed to appreciate the “degree and extent of prejudice” caused by Plaintiff’s spoliation; 3. The Court RESERVES JUDGMENT on whether Plaintiff deleted his Facebook Messages with Stephen McCafferty with an intent to deprive Defendants of the information’s use in litigation; Case 1:17-cv-02824-RMB-MJS Document 86 Filed 08/11/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 2859 4. The Court RESERVES JUDGMENT on the appropriate sanctions, if any, for Plaintiff’s non-prejudicial spoliation of his communications with Nicholas Walters and his prejudicial spoliation of his communications with Stephen McCafferty; and 5. At trial, the Court will submit to the jury the question of whether Plaintiff deleted his communications with McCafferty with an intent to deprive Defendants of the information’s use. s/ Renée Marie Bumb RENÉE MARIE BUMB United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?