HEFFLEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS FCI FORT DIX et al

Filing 67

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant's request for an extension of time for Plaintiff to submit his opposition papers; ORDERED that the motion to dismiss, ECF No. 62 , shall be adjourned until the 6/20/2023 motion day; ORDERED that Plaintiff's opposition is due 6/6/2023. Defendants' reply papers are due 6/13/2023. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 4/21/2023. (dmr)(n.m.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ______________________________ : TRAVIS HEFFLEY, : : Plaintiff, : Civ. No. 17-3647 (NLH)(SAK) : v. : MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER : : FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS : FCI FORT DIX, et al., : : Defendants. : ______________________________: APPEARANCES: Travis Heffley 17225-097 Otisville Federal Correctional Institution Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. Box 1000 Otisville, NY 10963 Plaintiff pro se Philip R. Sellinger, United States Attorney Heather Carney Costanzo, Assistant United States Attorney DOJ-USAO District Of New Jersey 402 East State Street Suite 430 Trenton, NJ 08608 Counsel for Defendants HILLMAN, District Judge WHEREAS, Plaintiff Travis Heffley filed a complaint alleging excessive force during a cell extraction at FCI Fort Dix, ECF No. 1; and 1 WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge King appointed counsel for Plaintiff for the limited purpose of serving Defendants, ECF No. 40. Defendants have now been served and have moved for dismissal of the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), ECF No. 62; and WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge King issued an order terminating counsel’s representation on April 20, 2023, ECF No. 66.1 Plaintiff is continuing in this matter pro se; and WHEREAS, Defendants’ motion to dismiss includes electronic materials: footage of the cell extraction at issue in Plaintiff’s complaint, see ECF No. 64; and WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge King entered a Discovery Confidentiality Order setting forth the terms under which Plaintiff shall be given access to view the footage, ECF No. 65; and WHEREAS, according to Defendants, “BOP policy at FCI Otisville provides that staff will log his copy of the video in as discovery, along with a chain of custody, send it to the unit manager, and upon assessment that it is discovery for a legal action, log it in to the education department, for Mr. Heffley’s viewing in the education department.” ECF No. 64 at 2. “This procedure, while time consuming, ensures that Mr. Heffley can The Court extends its appreciation to appointed counsel for the time and effort expended on this case. 1 2 safely view the video to prepare his opposition to our motion, without introducing any security concerns to the BOP institution.” Id.; and WHEREAS, Defendants request that the Court extend Plaintiff’s time to respond to the motion to dismiss for 45 days, id.; and WHEREAS, the Court agrees that an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to the motion to dismiss is warranted because of the “time consuming” process that is necessary to comply with BOP’s security procedures; and WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge King entered the Discovery Confidentiality Order on April 19, 2023, ECF No. 65. days from that date is June 3, 2023. Forty-five As that date is a Saturday, the Court extends the time for Plaintiff to file opposition until Tuesday, June 6, 2023 to align with the June 20, 2023 motion day. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(C); and WHEREAS, Defendants shall file any reply papers by June 13, 2023, IT IS therefore on this 21st day of April , 2023, ORDERED that Defendants’ request for an extension of time for Plaintiff to submit his opposition papers, ECF No. 64, shall be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss, ECF No. 62, shall be adjourned until the June 20, 2023 motion day; and it is further 3 ORDERED that Plaintiff’s opposition is due June 6, 2023. Defendants’ reply papers are due June 13, 2023; and it is finally ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail. s/ Noel L. Hillman NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. At Camden, New Jersey 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?