ARREOLA-ALBARRAN v. ORTIZ

Filing 2

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this case for petitioners failure to pay the filing fee. ORDERED that the clerk shall send the petitioner a copy of this order, as well as a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis in a habeas corpus case. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 6/29/2017. (rtm, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY _________________________________________ CANDIDO ARREOLA-ALBARRAN, : : Petitioner, : Civ. No. 17-4500 (RBK) : v. : : WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ, : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : Respondent. : _________________________________________ : Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This Court has not received a filing fee from petitioner, nor has he filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, this matter will be administratively terminated. Petitioner shall be given thirty days in which to reopen this action by either paying the $5.00 filing fee or submitting an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS this 29th day of June, 2017, ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this case for petitioner’s failure to pay the requisite filing fee of $5.00 or submit a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, and it is further ORDERED that if petitioner wishes to reopen this action, he shall notify the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this Order, in writing; petitioner’s writing shall include the $5.00 filing fee or a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on petitioner by regular U.S. mail as well as a copy of the blank form of a prisoner applying for in forma pauperis status in a habeas corpus case. s/Robert B. Kugler ROBERT B. KUGLER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?