BAILEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO ANSWER, Case reopened. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 2/15/18. (js)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
KAREEM BAILEY,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
No. 17-cv-13586 (NLH)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
IT APPEARING THAT:
Movant is proceeding pro se with an Amended Motion to
Vacate, Set Aside or Correct his Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255.
ECF No. 5.
In accordance with Rule 4(b) of the Rules
Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, see 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Rule
4(b), the Court has screened the Motion for dismissal and
determined that dismissal without an answer is not warranted.
Accordingly,
IT IS on this
15th
day of
February
, 2018,
ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to REOPEN this
case; and it is further
ORDERED that within forty-five (45) days of the date of the
entry of this Order, the United States shall electronically file
and serve an answer to the § 2255 Motion; and it is further
1
ORDERED that the answer shall respond to the allegations
and grounds of the Motion and shall adhere to Rule 5 of the
Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings; and it is further
ORDERED that the answer shall address the merits of each
claim raised in the Motion as well as whether the Motion is
timely; and it is further
ORDERED that the answer shall contain an index of exhibits;
and it is further
ORDERED that if the answer refers to briefs or transcripts,
orders, and other documents from prior proceedings, then the
United States shall serve and file them with the answer; and it
is further
ORDERED that Movant may serve and file a reply to the
answer within forty-five (45) days after the answer is filed;
and it is finally
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of
this Order on Movant by regular first-class mail.
s/ Noel L. Hillman
NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J.
At Camden, New Jersey
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?