SCHAFFER et al v. HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al

Filing 101

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 12/31/2020. (rss, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE DEREK SCHAFFER, Individually and on Behalf of Home Mortgage Corporation and CARL DIANTONIO, Individually and on Behalf of Home Mortgage Corporation, Civil No. 18-8842 (NLH/AMD) Plaintiffs, v. HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter comes before the Court sua sponte in light of Plaintiffs Derek Schaffer and Carl DiAntonio’s failure to appear for court-ordered hearings; failure to respond to the Court’s case; Order and to the Show Cause, Court having Recommendation submitted United Magistrate States and by failure considered the Judge, Honorable pursuant to prosecute the their Report Ann Marie to 28 and Donio, U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C); and the parties having been notified that they had fourteen (14) days from receipt of the Report and Recommendation to file and serve objections pursuant to Local 14 Civil Rule 72.1(c)(2), and no objections having been received; and the Court finding that the Report and Recommendation is neither clearly erroneous, nor contrary to law; and for good cause shown: IT IS on this _____ day of ______________ 2020 hereby 31st December ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ complaint shall be, and is hereby, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. At Camden, New Jersey ___________________________________ s/ Noel L. Hillman NOEL L HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. 15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?