MAERSK LINE v. TJM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al

Filing 9

ORDER Denying without prejudice 8 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment; ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a new motion for default judgment which addresses the deficiencies noted herein within thirty (30) days of this Order. Signed by Judge Noel L. Hillman on 4/18/2019. (dmr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MAERSK LINE, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 18-11668 (NLH/KMW) TJM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MARSH AND ASSOCIATES SIGNING SERVICES LLC, CHERYL MARSH, ORDER Defendants. APPEARANCES: RICK A. STEINBERG PRICE MEESE SHULMAN & D’ARMINIO, P.C. 50 TICE BOULEVARD 3RD FLOOR WOODCLIFF LAKE, NJ 07677 Attorney for Plaintiff Maersk Line. HILLMAN, District Judge WHEREAS this case was brought by Plaintiff on July 16, 2018 against Defendants Cheryl Marsh, Marsh & Associates Signing Services, LLC, and TJM International Limited Liability Company; and WHEREAS summons were thereafter issued and were returned executed as to all Defendants by July 23, 2018; and WHEREAS Plaintiff requested the Clerk to enter default against Defendants Marsh and Associates and TJM International (collectively, the “Entity Defendants”) on September 5, 2018; and WHEREAS the Clerk entered default as to the Entity Defendants on September 6, 2018; and WHEREAS on November 8, 2018 Plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment against Entity Defendants only; and WHEREAS a party seeking default judgment “is not entitled to a default judgment as of a right,” Franklin v. Nat’l Maritime Union of Am., No. 91-480, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9819, at *3-4 (D.N.J. 1991) (quoting 10 Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2685 (1983)), aff’d, 972 F.2d 1331 (3d Cir. 1992); and WHEREAS the decision to enter a default judgment is “left primarily to the discretion of the district court,” Hritz v. Woma Corp., 732 F.2d 1178, 1180 (3d Cir. 1984); and WHEREAS before entering a default judgment the Court must decide whether “the unchallenged facts constitute a legitimate cause of action, since a party in default does not admit mere conclusions of law,” Chanel v. Gordashevsky, 558 F. Supp. 2d 532, 535 (D.N.J. 2008) (citing Directv, Inc. v. Asher, No. 031969, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14027, at *3 (D.N.J. Mar. 14, 2006)); and WHEREAS the Court reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, the attachments thereto, and all other filings on the 2 docket, and finds Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment deficient in the following respects: • Plaintiff does not include a brief explaining why it is entitled to default judgment, on what claims it is entitled to default judgment, the elements of those claims and how it has shown each of those elements, the appropriate measure of damages under those claims, and what damages it is entitled to in light of the above and the facts presented in this case; • More specifically, Plaintiff has not explained to this Court the statutory basis for the claim under the Shipping Act and its effects - including preemption - on the state law claims asserted, if any; • Plaintiff has not filed on the docket the contract under which it asserts its claim for breach of contract; • Plaintiff provides an account summary, but has not provided to the Court the service contracts, bills of lading, freight bills, or invoices upon which it asserts this summary is based and which would be required for the Court to determine the correct amount of damages, if any, for the claims asserted; and WHEREAS in light of those deficiencies, this Court finds it cannot properly enter default judgment at this time; but 3 WHEREAS this Court finds those deficiencies may be cured through further briefing and the filing of exhibits; THEREFORE, IT IS on this 18th day of April , 2019 ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [8] is hereby DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a new motion for default judgment which addresses the deficiencies noted herein within thirty (30) days of this Order. s/ Noel L. Hillman NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. At Camden, New Jersey 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?