BAKER v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al

Filing 20

OPINION AND ORDER: Directing the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE the Complaint under Local Civil Rule 10.1; Plaintiff may reopen the Complaint by submitting his current address; the Clerk shall REOPEN the Complaint upon receipt of Plaintiff's updated address. Signed by Judge Edward S. Kiel on 8/29/2024. (mag, N.M.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY COREY BAKER, Case No. 22–cv–02423–ESK–AMD Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff Corey Baker submitted a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 27, 2022 (Complaint). (ECF No. 1.) On August 28, 2024, mail sent to plaintiff at his address of record was returned to the Clerk’s Office as undeliverable. (ECF No. 19.) The return sticker stated “Return to Sender. Refused. Unable to Forward.” (Id.) Pro se plaintiffs have an obligation to keep the Clerk’s Office informed as to their current addresses. L.Civ.R. 10.1(a) (“Counsel and/or unrepresented parties must advise the Court of any change in their … address within seven days of being apprised of such change by filing a notice of said change with the Clerk.”). Plaintiff has not communicated with the Court regarding a change of address. “Failure to file a notice of address change may result in the imposition of sanctions by the Court.” L.Civ.R. 10.1(a). IT IS on this 29th day of August 2024 ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE the Complaint under Local Civil Rule 10.1. 2. Plaintiff may reopen the Complaint by submitting his current address. The Clerk shall REOPEN the Complaint upon receipt of plaintiff’s updated address. 3. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Opinion and Order to plaintiff by regular mail at his last known address. /s/ Edward S. Kiel EDWARD S. KIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?