BAKER v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER: Directing the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE the Complaint under Local Civil Rule 10.1; Plaintiff may reopen the Complaint by submitting his current address; the Clerk shall REOPEN the Complaint upon receipt of Plaintiff's updated address. Signed by Judge Edward S. Kiel on 8/29/2024. (mag, N.M.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
COREY BAKER,
Case No. 22–cv–02423–ESK–AMD
Plaintiff,
v.
OPINION AND ORDER
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et
al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Corey Baker submitted a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
on April 27, 2022 (Complaint). (ECF No. 1.) On August 28, 2024, mail sent
to plaintiff at his address of record was returned to the Clerk’s Office as
undeliverable. (ECF No. 19.) The return sticker stated “Return to Sender.
Refused. Unable to Forward.” (Id.)
Pro se plaintiffs have an obligation to keep the Clerk’s Office informed as
to their current addresses. L.Civ.R. 10.1(a) (“Counsel and/or unrepresented
parties must advise the Court of any change in their … address within seven
days of being apprised of such change by filing a notice of said change with the
Clerk.”). Plaintiff has not communicated with the Court regarding a change of
address. “Failure to file a notice of address change may result in the
imposition of sanctions by the Court.” L.Civ.R. 10.1(a).
IT IS on this
29th day of August 2024 ORDERED that:
1.
The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE the Complaint
under Local Civil Rule 10.1.
2.
Plaintiff may reopen the Complaint by submitting his current
address. The Clerk shall REOPEN the Complaint upon receipt of plaintiff’s
updated address.
3.
The Clerk shall send a copy of this Opinion and Order to plaintiff by
regular mail at his last known address.
/s/ Edward S. Kiel
EDWARD S. KIEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?