OWNBEY et al v. AKER KVAERNER INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTORS et al

Filing 546

ORDER denying 520 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; dismissing 521 Motion to Strike ; declines to adopt 531 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Katharine S. Hayden on 9/2/15. (rg, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SHELBY OWNBEY AND JOYCE OWNBEY, Plaintiffs, Civil No: 07-2190 (KSH) v. AKER KVAERNER PHARMACEUTICALS INC., et al., ORDER Defendants. AKER KVAERNER PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Third Party Plaintiff, v. ADVANTAGE BUILDINGS & EXTERIOR, INC., MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY CO., ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH PA., Third Party Defendants. This matter comes before the Court on Aker Kvaerner Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (“Aker”) motion for partial summary judgment on its claim for insurance coverage [D.E. 520] and motion to strike and dismiss the subrogation claim asserted by Mid-Continent Casualty Co. (“MCC”) [D.E. 521]. This Court referred both motions to the Honorable Cathy L. Waldor, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Waldor filed a Report and Recommendation on October 1, 2014 [D.E. 531] recommending that this Court grant both motions. MCC filed its objections to the Report and Recommendation on October 17, 2014 [D.E. 534] and Aker filed its response on October 31, 2014 [D.E. 535]. After reviewing the Report and Recommendations de novo, the Court declines to adopt it, and for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed herewith, IT IS on this 2nd day of September, 2015, ORDERED that Aker does not qualify as an additional insured under the MCC Policy No. 04-GL-00570143; and it is further ORDERED that MCC’s subrogation claims are dismissed. /s/ Katharine S. Hayden Katharine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?