VELAZQUEZ v. ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE et al

Filing 90

ORDER denying 68 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 82 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 84 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 87 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Katharine S. Hayden on 12/21/10. (rg, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JESUS VELASQUEZ Plaintiff, v. ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DAWN MILLER, CHARLES BARONE, CHRISTINE DEANGELIS, STEPHEN PENN, CAROLYN MADISON, ERNEST LEE, JERRY SPEZIAL, and CHRYSTAL MORTON, Defendants. ORDER Civ. Action No. 08-53 (KSH)

KATHARINE S. HAYDEN, U.S.D.J. This matter having come before the Court by way of four motions to dismiss by defendants (1) Dawn Miller [D.E. 68]; (2) Charles Barone and Christine DeAngelis [D.E. 84]; (3) Stephen Penn, Carolyn Madison, and Chrystal Morton [D.E. 82]; and (4) Ernest Lee [D.E. 87]; and the Court having considered the parties' arguments and written submissions; and for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion filed herewith, IT IS on this 21st day of December, 2010, ORDERED that the defendants' motions to dismiss [D.E. 68, 82, 84, 87] are denied with the expectation that dispositive motion practice will be renewed after discovery.

/s/ Katharine S. Hayden December 21, 2010 1 Katharine S. Hayden, USDJ