MAXIMUM HUMAN PERFORMANCE, INC. v. DYMATIZE ENTERPRISES, INC. et al

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Salas; pltf's motion to stay is denied; deft's motion to transfer the action to the Northern District of Texas is granted. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 9/14/09. (jd, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TilE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

MAXIMUM HUMAN PERFORMANCE. INC. Plaintiff.

Civil Action No. 09-235 (PGS)

ORDER
V

DYMATIZE ENTERPRISES, INC. and MICHAEL CASID, Deftmdants.

A Report and Recommendation was filed on August 27, 2009 recommending that this Court deny Plaintiff's motion to stay prosecution of an action filed in the Northern District of Texas (docket entry number 6) and to grant 1)efendant's motion to transkr venue to the Northern I)istrict of Texas (docket entry number 9). The parties were given notice that they had until September 11, 2009 to object to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.I(c)(2). No objections having been received, and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo, and good cause appearing; It is, on this
th 14

day of September. 2009.

ORI)ERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Esther Salas at Docket Entry No. 1 7 is hereby adopted as the opinion of the Court: and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to stay at Docket Entry No. 6 is denied; and it is further

__

ORDERED that 1)efendant's motion to transfer the action to the Northern District of
Texas at Docket Entry No. 9 is granted.

(iLl
-

4)
I
-

Pill R (. Sill RID V\ U SI)