LAUTENBERG FOUNDATION, THE et al v. MADOFF

Filing 32

LETTER ORDER scheduling Initial Conference for 11/5/2009 03:30 PM in Newark - Courtroom 2A before Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo. JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE. CM/ECF IS MANDATORY FOR ALL FILINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo on 10/27/2009. (kd)

Download PDF
LAUTENBERG FOUNDATION, THE et al v. MADOFF Doc. 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT D IS T R IC T OF NEW JERSEY CHAMBERS OF M A D E L IN E COX ARLEO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN LUTHER KING COURTHOUSE 50 WALNUT ST. ROOM 2060 NEW ARK, NJ 07101 973-297-4903 October 27, 2009 Greg Trif, Esq. Mcelroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP 1300 Mount Kemble Avenue P.O. Box 2075 Morristown , NJ 07962 William F. Maderer, Esq. Saiber LLC One Gateway Center 13th Floor Newark , NJ 07102-5311 LETTER ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 16.1 RE: The Lautenberg Foundation, et al v. Madoff Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-00816 (SRC) Dear Counsel: A scheduling conference shall be conducted before the undersigned at 3:30 p.m. on Thursday, November 5, 2009 , in Courtroom 2A of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Courthouse Building, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, New Jersey. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16.1 and L.Civ.R. 16.1(a). Counsel are advised that the early disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 will be enforced. Therefore, counsel shall immediately exchange the following information without a formal discovery request: identities of individuals likely to have knowledge of discoverable facts; documents and things in the possession of counsel or the party; identities of experts and their opinions; insurance agreements in force; and statement of the basis for any damages claimed. Dockets.Justia.com At least fourteen (14) days prior to the conference scheduled herein, counsel shall personally meet and confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and shall submit a discovery plan to the undersigned not later than 72 hours prior to the conference with the Court. The discovery plan shall include (1) a brief summary of the claims and defenses; and (2) a proposed schedule for completing fact and expert discovery. The discovery plan may include a summary of the status of settlement negotiations. (THE DISCOVERY PLAN SHALL BE IN THE FORM ATTACHED AND SHALL BE SUBMITTED JOINTLY.) At the conference, the Court will address scheduling of all motions. No motions shall be filed without prior leave of Court. If any motions have already been filed, please advise the Court immediately, in writing, regarding the nature of the motion and its present status. Pursuant to my Standing Procedures found in Appendix 2 of Lite's New Jersey Federal Practice Rules, you may submit unopposed applications for pro hac vice admission with my Chambers. Please obtain consent of your adversary prior to filing your application, advising both in your cover letter and proposed Order that you have consent. At the conference, all parties who are not appearing pro se must be represented by counsel who shall have full authority to bind their clients in all pre-trial matters. Counsel shall also be prepared to discuss the merits of the case and have settlement authority. Clients or persons with authority over the matter shall be available by telephone. See L.Civ.R. 16.1(a). Counsel for plaintiff(s) shall notify any party, who hereafter enters an appearance, of the above conference, and forward to that party a copy of this Order. The parties must advise this Court immediately if this action has been settled or terminated so that the above conference may be canceled. Failure to comply with the terms herein may result in the imposition of sanctions. SO ORDERED this day, October 27, 2009. s/Madeline Cox Arleo MADELINE COX ARLEO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Orig: Clerk cc: Courtroom Deputy File UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : Plaintiff(s), v. : : : Defendant(s). : Civil Action No. Hon. JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN 1. Set forth a factual description of the case. Include the causes of action and affirmative defenses asserted. Have settlement discussions taken place? Yes __________ No __________ If so, when? ____________________________________________________________ (a) What was plaintiff's last demand? (1) (2) (b) Monetary demand: $ ___________ Non-monetary demand: __________ 2. What was defendant's last offer? (1) (2) Monetary offer: $ ___________ Non-monetary offer: __________ 3. The parties [have ______ -have not ______] exchanged the information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). If not, state the reason therefor. Describe any discovery conducted other than the above disclosures. Generally, dispositive Motions cannot be filed until the completion of discovery. Describe any Motions any party may seek to make prior to the completion of discovery. Include any jurisdictional Motions and Motions to Amend. The parties proposed the following: (a) Discovery is needed on the following subjects: (b) (c) Should discovery be conducted in phases? If so, explain. Number of Interrogatories by each party to each other party: ________ 4. 5. 6. (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) Number of Depositions to be taken by each party: ___________ Plaintiff's expert report due on _______________. Defendant's expert report due on ______________. Motions to Amend or to Add Parties to be filed by _______________. Dispositive motions to be served within ______days of completion of discovery. Factual discovery to be completed by . Expert discovery to be completed by ____________. Set forth any special discovery mechanism or procedure requested, including data preservation orders or protective orders: A pretrial conference may take place on . (l) (m) Trial by jury or non-jury Trial? (n) 7. Trial date: ______________________. Do you anticipate any discovery problem(s)? Yes __________ No __________ If so, explain. Do you anticipate any special discovery needs (i.e., videotape/telephone depositions, problems with out-of state witnesses or documents, etc.)? Yes ________ No _______ If so, explain. State whether this case is appropriate for voluntary arbitration (pursuant to L. Civ. R. 201.1 or otherwise), mediation (pursuant to L. Civ. R. 301.1 or otherwise), appointment of a special master or other special procedure. If not, explain why and state whether any such procedure may be appropriate at a later time (i.e., after exchange of pretrial disclosures, after completion of depositions, after disposition of dispositive motions, etc.). Is this case appropriate for bifurcation? Yes __________ No __________ We [do _____ do not Judge. ] consent to the trial being conducted by a Magistrate 8. 9. 10. 11. Attorney(s) for Plaintiff(s) Attorney(s) for Defendant(s) ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Mediation is the Alternative Dispute Resolution ( "ADR") program in this Court. Mediation is governed by Local Civil Rule 301.1. The mediation program under this rule is supervised by a judicial officer (at present United States Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo) who is available to answer any questions about the program. Any district judge or magistrate judge may refer a civil action to mediation. This may be done without the consent of the parties. However, the Court encourages parties to confer among themselves and consent to mediation. Moreover, you are reminded that, when counsel confer pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 26.1, one of the topics that must be addressed is the eligibility of a civil action for participation in ADR. A civil action may be referred to mediation at any time. However, one of the advantages of mediation is that, if successful, it enables parties to avoid the time and expense of discovery and trial. Accordingly, the Court encourages parties to consent to mediation prior to or at the time that automatic disclosures are made pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If parties consent to mediation, they may choose a mediator either from the list of certified mediators maintained by the Court or by the selection of a private mediator. If a civil action is referred to mediation without consent of the parties, the judicial officer responsible for supervision of the program will select the mediator. Mediation is non-judgmental. The role of the mediator is to assist the parties in reaching a resolution of their dispute. The parties may confer with the mediator on an ex parte basis. Anything said to the mediator will be deemed to be confidential and will not be revealed to another party or to others without the party's consent. The first six hours of a mediator's time is free. The mediator's hourly rate thereafter is $150.00, which is borne equally by the parties. If you would like further information with regard to the mediation program please review the Guidelines for Mediation, which are available on the Court's Web Site "pacer.njd.uscourts.gov" and appear as Appendix Q to the Local Civil Rules. You may also make inquiries of the judicial officer responsible for supervision of the program. Civil actions in which there are pro se parties (incarcerated or not) are not eligible for mediation. DNJ-Med-001 Rev. (10/00)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?