SMITH v. MERIAL LIMITED et al

Filing 70

Consent Order regarding limited discovery; Defendants shall begin serving responsive material to the discovery request within 30 days of the date hereof; Status Conference scheduled before Judge Martini for 6/18/13 at 10AM, etc. Signed by Judge William J. Martini on 3/19/13. (gh, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Civil Action No. lO-439(WJM)(MF) SANDY SMITH, et al., Plaintiffs, V. MERIAL LIMITED, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1 O-442(WJM)(MF) BRIAN McDONOUGH, et aL, Plaintiffs, V. BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, Defendant. Civil Action. No. lO-1050(WJM)(MF) AUNDRIA ARLANDSON, et al., Plaintiffs, V. HARTZ MOUNTAIN CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-1391 (WJM)(MF) KRISTY SNYDER, et al., Plaintiffs, V. FARNAM COMPANIES, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action o. l0-6372(WJM)(MF) SUNNY JOHANSSON, et at., Plaintiffs, V. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY, et at., Defendants. Civil Action. No. 1 1-6976(WJM)(MF) LYNDA FROST, et at., Plaintiffs, V. FIDOPHARM, INC., et at., Defendants. CONSENT ORDER REGARDING LIMITED DISCOVERY THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by Plaintiffs and Defendants to these consolidated actions (the “Actions”) through their undersigned counsel; and WHEREAS on February 4, 2013 this Court scheduled an in-person status conference in the Actions (Dkt. No. 144)1; and WHEREAS on February 26, 2013 counsel appeared before the Hon. William J. Martini, U.S.D.J. for the status conference. During that status conference, Judge Martini advised the parties that they were to engage in limited discovery the scope and duration of which they were to meet-and-confer regarding and report back to the Court (Dkt. No. 145); All references to docket entries are from the Arlandson action (Civ. No. 10-1050). Each of the Actions has a similar entry on its docket. 2 ____________ WHEREAS the parties met-and-conferred regarding the scope and duration of the limited discovery and determined that they needed additional time to complete the meet-andconfer process. Accordingly, the parties sought, and the Court granted them an additional time to report back to the Court regarding the scope and duration of the limited discovery, and WHEREAS the parties have completed the meet-and-confer process and have agreed on the scope and duration of the limited discovery ordered by the Court; and the Court having reviewed the submission of counsel, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED on this day of March, 2013, as follows: I. Plaintiffs have requested production of the following information in categories (a) through (d) below (the “Discovery Request”), and the non-retail defendants (the “Product Defendants”) have agreed to produce certified responses and documents setting forth 2 the requested information or appropriate objections within the time provided in Paragraph 2 below which are within the Production Request. Neither side shall be prejudiced by the production or lack thereof of any information or documents. Subject to Paragraph 2 below, Product Defendants shall provide: a. b. 2 Information regarding the total units sold by the Product Defendants of the products Plaintiffs allege in their current respective operative complaints in the above captioned actions to have purchased in the United States for the period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012, and setting forth the gross revenue from such sales broken down to the extent practicable by individual product and by year; Summary information regarding safety-related adverse events in animals in the United States related to the products Plaintiffs allege The “Product Defendants” shall be comprised of Merial Limited, Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Hartz Mountain Corp., Farnam Companies, Inc., Wellmark, Fidopharm, Sergeant’s Pet Care Products, Inc., Summit Vetpharm, LLC, and Velcera, Inc. 3 in their Complaint to have purchased for the period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012; c. d. 2. Information submitted by the Product Defendants to the EPA regarding safety-related adverse events in animals in the United States related to the products Plaintiffs allege in their Complaint to have purchased for the period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012; and Information regarding the existence and terms of any voluntary reimbursement policies or programs in effect for the Product Defendants in the United States related to the products Plaintiffs allege in their Amended Complaint to have purchased for the period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012. Defendants shall ce serving responsive material to the Discovery Request within thirty (30) days of the date hereof, and complete production of all additional responsive material within sixty (60) days of the date hereof. 3. In any action where there is more than one Product Defendant, the Product Defendants’ responsive material, if any, shall be served only on Plaintiffs’ counsel and not on any other Defendant. 4. Each party shall submit a memorandum to the Court following the conclusion of this limited discovery period, setting forth their position as to the respective actions including what the discovery reveals and what course the litigation should take. These memoranda are to be no longer than five pages each and should be submitted to Chambers on or before - L LL /c 5. 2013 The Court shall hold a status conference , 2013, to discuss the status of these Actions and what further proceedings, if any, may be appropriate. 6. A copy of this Order shall be served on all :ounsel of record via ECF. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. WILL Dated: March . ARTINI, U.S.D.J. [/f 1 2013 CONSENTED AND AGREED TO BY: CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO GREEN & ASSOCIATES, LLC Is! Michael S Green Michael S. Green 522 Route 18, P.O. Box 428 East Brunswick, New Jersey 08816 (732) 390-0480 Is! James E. Cecchi James E. Cecchi Lindsey H. Taylor 5 Becker Farm Road Roseland, New Jersey 07068 (973) 994-1700 Attorneys for Plaintiffs (ArlandsonlSmitW McDonough!Snyder/Frost/Valentine) Attorneys for Plaintiffs (Arlandson/Johansson/ Cedeno/Shelby/Walsh/Ainsley) KANTROWITZ, GOLDHAMER & GRAIFMAN, P.C. COHN LIFLAND PEARLMAN HERRMANN & KNOPFF /s/ Gary S. Grailman 210 Summit Avenue Montvale, New Jersey 07645 (201) 391-7000 Is! Jeffrey W. Hermann Jeffrey W. He:nann Park 80 Plaza West-One Saddle Brook, New Jersey 07663 (201) 845-9600 Attorney for Plaintiffs (An andson/Smith/McDonoughlSnyder/Frost/ Valentine) Attorneys for Plaintiffs (Arlandson/SmithfMcDonoughlSnyder/FrostJ Valentine) 5 _________________________ DIAMOND LAW OFFICE, LLC /s/ Paul Diamond Paul Diamond 1605 John Street, Suite 102 Fort Lee, New Jersey 07024 (201) 242-1110 Attorney for Plaintiffs (Arlandson/SrnithfMcDonoughlSnyder/FrostJ Valentine) — LOWENSTEIN SANDLER, LLP COUGHLIN DUFFY LLP Is/Alan Stuart Modlinger Gavin J. Rooney Kristin Muir 65 Livingston Avenue Roseland, NJ 07666 (973) 597-2434 Is! Kelly A. Waters Kelly A. Waters Timothy P. Smith 350 Mount Kemble Avenue Morristown, NJ 07962 (973) 631-6016 Attorney for Defendants (Merial/Merck) COUGHLIN DUFFY LLP Attorneys for Defendants (FarnanilWellmark! Central Garden) — /s/Lorna A. Dotro Is! Beth S. Rose S. Rose Vincent Lodato One Riverfront Plaza Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 966-8406 Lorna A. Dotro Beth Mark K. Silver 350 Mount Kemble Avenue Morristown, NJ 07962 (973) 631-6016 Attorney for Defendants (Bayer) Attorneys for Defendants (Fidopharm/VelceralWal-Mart) HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP BLOOM & DILLON, P.C. Is! SILLS CUMMIS & GROSS P.C. J. Dillon Paul J. Dillon 70 South Orange Avenue, Suite 240 Livingston, NJ 07039 (973) 758-0900 Is! Daniel E. Tranen Daniel E. Tranen Geoffrey M. Coan 28 State Street ‘4th Floor Boston, MA 02 109-1775 (617) 213-7000 Paul Attorney for Defendants (Sergeant’s, Target and PetSmart) Attorneys for Defendants (Summit VetPharm) 6 KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP Is! Geoffrey W. Castello Jonathon K. Cooperman Geoffrey W. Castello 200 Kimball Drive Parsippany, NJ 07054 (973) 503590O Attorney for Defendants (Hartz and Wal Mart) 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?