WEINGRAM & ASSOCIATES, P.C. v. GRAYZEL, M.D. et al

Filing 101

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Arleo, filed on 12/20/12; the cross motion of deft Dr. Joseph Grayzel to remand this matter to the Superior Court of New Jersey is Granted. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 2/25/13. (jd, )

Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY __________________________________________ : WEINGRAM & ASSOCIATES, P.C., : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No. 10-2362 (SDW) : v. : : ORDER JOSEPH GRAYZEL, M.D., : : Defendant/Counterclaimant, : : February 25, 2013 v. : : WEINGRAM & ASSOCIATES, P.C., : EDWARD WEINGRAM, ESQ., JOHN : DOE 1-20 (fictitious names for real parties), : : Counterclaim Defendants. : : _________________________________________: ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter comes before this Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo (“Magistrate Judge Arleo”), filed on December 20, 2012. On December 12, 2012, an Order to Show Cause hearing was held before Magistrate Judge Arleo. On January 14, 2013, objections were filed, and on January 18, 2013, the objections were supplemented. 1 This Court has reviewed the reasons set forth on the record by Magistrate Judge Arleo, the R&R, and the other documents on file in this matter. Based on the foregoing, and for the reasons set forth in this Court’s Opinion dated February 25, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED that the R&R of Magistrate Judge Arleo, filed on December 20, 2012 is ADOPTED as the conclusions of law of this Court. The cross motion of defendant Dr. Joseph Grayzel to remand this matter to the Superior Court of New Jersey is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. s/Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J. Orig: Clerk cc: Judge Arleo Parties 1 On February 22, 2013, after this Court completed its review, these objections were withdrawn. (Dkt. No. 99.) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?