WEINGRAM & ASSOCIATES, P.C. v. GRAYZEL, M.D. et al
Filing
101
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Arleo, filed on 12/20/12; the cross motion of deft Dr. Joseph Grayzel to remand this matter to the Superior Court of New Jersey is Granted. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 2/25/13. (jd, )
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
__________________________________________
:
WEINGRAM & ASSOCIATES, P.C.,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
Civil Action No. 10-2362 (SDW)
:
v.
:
:
ORDER
JOSEPH GRAYZEL, M.D.,
:
:
Defendant/Counterclaimant,
:
:
February 25, 2013
v.
:
:
WEINGRAM & ASSOCIATES, P.C.,
:
EDWARD WEINGRAM, ESQ., JOHN
:
DOE 1-20 (fictitious names for real parties),
:
:
Counterclaim Defendants.
:
:
_________________________________________:
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This matter comes before this Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United
States Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo (“Magistrate Judge Arleo”), filed on December 20,
2012. On December 12, 2012, an Order to Show Cause hearing was held before Magistrate Judge
Arleo. On January 14, 2013, objections were filed, and on January 18, 2013, the objections were
supplemented. 1
This Court has reviewed the reasons set forth on the record by Magistrate Judge Arleo, the
R&R, and the other documents on file in this matter. Based on the foregoing, and for the reasons set
forth in this Court’s Opinion dated February 25, 2013, it is hereby
ORDERED that the R&R of Magistrate Judge Arleo, filed on December 20, 2012 is
ADOPTED as the conclusions of law of this Court.
The cross motion of defendant Dr. Joseph Grayzel to remand this matter to the Superior
Court of New Jersey is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
s/Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J.
Orig: Clerk
cc:
Judge Arleo
Parties
1
On February 22, 2013, after this Court completed its review, these objections were withdrawn. (Dkt. No. 99.)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?