LOTTOTRON, INC. v. ATHILA STATION, ET. AL

Filing 223

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Mag. Judge Hammer entering default judgment against deft. iNetbet for the sum of $4,144,224.00, against deft. Trenan for the sum of $2,184,000.00, against deft. Winward for the sum of $4,144,224.00 and all in favor of pltf. Lottotron, Inc.. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 12/4/2012. (nr, )

Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LOTTOTRON, INC., Civil Action No.: 10-4318 (JLL) Plaintiff, V. ORDER ATHILA STATION, et al., Defendants. THIS MATTER comes before the Court by way of Plaintiff Lottotron, Inc.’s application for damages as to three defaulting defendants [Docket Entry No. 211]. This Court had referred Plaintiff’s application to the Honorable Michael A. Hammer, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Hammer filed a Report and Recommendation in connection with said application on November 16, 2012. In particular, Magistrate Judge Hammer recommended that judgment be entered against each of the defaulting defendants for damages in the following amounts: 1. iNetbet 2. Trenan-- $2,184,000 3. Winward -- $42 144,224 -- $4,144,224. To date, the Court has received no objections with respect to Magistrate Judge Hammer’s Report and Recommendation, and for good cause shown, IT IS on this 4 day of December, 2012, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hammer, filed on November 16, 2012 [CM/ECF Docket Entry No. 222], is hereby ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall, within fifteen (15) days, submit a proposed Judgment memorializing the Court’s ruling for the Court’s consideration. IT IS SO ORDERED. Linares Judge 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?