SCOTT v. RICCI et al
Filing
30
OPINION. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 12/18/2018. (JB, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
REGINALD SCOTT,
Civil Action No. 10-6168(SRC)
Petitioner,
v.
OPINION
MICHELLE R. RICCI, et al.,
Respondent.
I.
INTRODUCTION
This matter has been opened to the Court by Petitioner's filing of a Petition for a writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. Having reviewed the Petition, Respondent's
Answer, and the relevant record, the Court will deny the Petition for the reasons stated in this
Opinion and will also deny a certificate of appealability.
II.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
After pleading guilty in August 1997 to two counts of an amended charge of first-degree
aggravated manslaughter, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-4(a)(l ), and other charges, Scott was sentenced on the
first manslaughter count to a sixty-year term of imprisonment with a twenty-five year period of
parole ineligibility. 1 The judge determined that he was subject to sentencing pursuant to the
Graves Act, N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6(c) and -7(c) and N.J.S.A. 2C:44--3(d), and found that three
aggravating factors substantially outweighed the non-existent mitigating factors. Concurrent
terms of imprisonment were imposed based on Scott's guilty plea to the second count of
1
Portions of the factual background are taken from the state court decision, State v. Scott, No. A2211-11Tl, 2013 WL 375548, at *1-2 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Feb. 1, 2013).
1
12-18-18
s/ Stanley R. Chesler
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?