HAVENS et al v. MOBEX NETWORK SERVICES, LLC et al

Filing 251

ORDER granting 203 Motion. Signed by Judge Katharine S. Hayden on 5/14/14. (rg, )

Download PDF
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey WARREN HAVENS; SKYBRIDGE SPECTRUM FOUNDATION; TELESAURUS VPC, LLC; AMTS CONSORTIUM, LLC; INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION & MONITORING, LLC; TELESAURUS GB, LLC, Plaintiffs, Civil No.: 11-993 (KSH) (CLW) v. MOBEX NETWORK SERVICES, LLC; MOBEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; PAGING SYSTEMS, INC.; TOUCH TEL CORPORATION; MARITIME COMMUNICATIONS/LAND MOBILE, LLC, Order Defendants. This matter having been opened to the Court upon the motion of defendants Paging Systems, Inc. and Touch Tel Corporation (collectively, the “Paging Systems Defendants”) for an order granting the Paging Systems Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement or For Dismissal with Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41(b) [D.E. 203], and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion, IT IS, on this 14th day of May, 2014, ORDERED that the Paging Systems Defendants’ Motion [D.E. 203] is hereby GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall, within 15 days of the entry of this Order, comply with their outstanding obligations under the Settlement Agreement between Plaintiffs and the Paging Systems Defendants including, but not limited to, (i) executing and delivering, via email, the Officer’s Certificates and Assignment and Assumptions Agreements memorializing the assignments of geographic AMTS license effected by numbered paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Settlement Agreement, (ii) filing all required notices of consummation of assignment with the FCC, and (iii) causing Plaintiffs’ counsel of counsel of record to execute and deliver, via email, a stipulation, in the form agreed to by the parties, dismissing the Paging Systems Defendants from this action with prejudice. /s/ Katharine S. Hayden Katharine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?