HAVENS et al v. MOBEX NETWORK SERVICES, LLC et al
Filing
251
ORDER granting 203 Motion. Signed by Judge Katharine S. Hayden on 5/14/14. (rg, )
United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
WARREN HAVENS; SKYBRIDGE
SPECTRUM FOUNDATION; TELESAURUS
VPC, LLC; AMTS CONSORTIUM, LLC;
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION &
MONITORING, LLC; TELESAURUS GB, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
Civil No.: 11-993 (KSH) (CLW)
v.
MOBEX NETWORK SERVICES, LLC;
MOBEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; PAGING
SYSTEMS, INC.; TOUCH TEL
CORPORATION; MARITIME
COMMUNICATIONS/LAND MOBILE, LLC,
Order
Defendants.
This matter having been opened to the Court upon the motion of defendants Paging
Systems, Inc. and Touch Tel Corporation (collectively, the “Paging Systems Defendants”) for an
order granting the Paging Systems Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement or
For Dismissal with Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41(b) [D.E. 203], and for the reasons set forth in
the accompanying opinion,
IT IS, on this 14th day of May, 2014,
ORDERED that the Paging Systems Defendants’ Motion [D.E. 203] is hereby
GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall, within 15 days of the entry of this Order, comply with
their outstanding obligations under the Settlement Agreement between Plaintiffs and the Paging
Systems Defendants including, but not limited to, (i) executing and delivering, via email, the
Officer’s Certificates and Assignment and Assumptions Agreements memorializing the
assignments of geographic AMTS license effected by numbered paragraphs 2 and 3 of the
Settlement Agreement, (ii) filing all required notices of consummation of assignment with the
FCC, and (iii) causing Plaintiffs’ counsel of counsel of record to execute and deliver, via email, a
stipulation, in the form agreed to by the parties, dismissing the Paging Systems Defendants from
this action with prejudice.
/s/ Katharine S. Hayden
Katharine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?