GLOBAL FORWARDING LTD. v. OU HOLDING LTD. et al

Filing 37

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, and thus denies Defts' motion to dismiss pending discovery regarding whether the Court can properly exercise jurisdiction over Defts. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 4/18/12. (sr, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY GLOBAL FORWARDING LTD., Civil Action No.: 11-3220 (CCC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER OU HOLDINGS LTD., STRATEGIC MARKETING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC., McLANE COMPANY INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC., SAM’S WEST, INC., AND SAM’S EAST, INC., Defendants. THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon motion by Defendants OU Holdings Ltd. and Strategic Marketing & Management Services, LLC. (collectively, “Defendants”) to dismiss Plaintiff Global Forwarding Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint for improper service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5), for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2), and failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). [ECF No.15 .] On April 3, 2012, Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson issued a Report and Recommendation that the Court Deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss and grant Plaintiff jurisdictional discovery. [ECF No. 36.] No objections have been filed thereto. The Court has considered the submissions of the parties, and Judge Dickson’s Report and Recommendation dated April 3, 2012, and for substantially the same reasons stated therein, IT IS on this 18th day of April , 2012, ORDERED that this Court adopts Judge Dickson’s April 3, 2012 Report and Recommendation and thus Denies without prejudice Defendants’ motion to dismiss pending discovery regarding whether the Court can properly exercise jurisdiction over Defendants. s/ Claire C. Cecchi HON. CLAIRE C. CECCHI United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?