HAHN v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al

Filing 146

ORDER granting Defts' 89 Motion to Dismiss w/ prejudice. The claims of Defts, the United States Department of Commerce, Patrizia Warhaffigi, and John E. Tenhoeve will be dismissed w/in 30 days unless Pltf establishes that service was effected on Defts w/in 120 days of filing the Complaint, by filing a proof of service by 7/17/2013. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 6/17/2013. (drw)

Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ___________________________________ PHILIP E. HAHN, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT : OF COMMERCE, et al., : : Defendants. : ___________________________________ : Civil Action 11-6369 (ES) ORDER This matter having come before the Court upon motion by Defendants Borough of Tenafly (“Tenafly”) and Thomas B. Hanrahan’s (“Hanhrahan”) who seek dismissal of Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6); and the Court having considered the parties’ submissions; and for good cause shown; IT IS on this 17th day of June, 2013, hereby ORDERED that Defendant Thomas B. Hanrahan’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (D.E. No. 89) is GRANTED with prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant Borough of Tenafly’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (D.E. No. 89) is GRANTED with prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall terminate docket entry no. 89; and it is further ORDERED that the claims of Defendants, the United States Department of Commerce, Patrizia Warhaffigi, and John E. Tenhoeve will be dismissed within 30 days unless Plaintiff establishes that service was effected on Defendants, the United States Department of Commerce, Patrizia Warhaffigi, and John E. Tenhoeve, within said 120 days of filing the Complaint, by filing proof of service with the Clerk of the Court on or before July 17, 2013. s/Esther Salas Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?