EPSTEIN et al v. GOODMAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LP, et al

Filing 87

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 85 Report and Recommendations and terminating Fifth-Party Complaint; Elica S.p.A., f/k/a FiMe - Elica S.p.A. Motor Division and SKF Industrie S.p.A. terminated. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 2/4/15. (jr)

Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MEL and CHERYL EPSTEIN. Plaintiffs, V. ORDER GOODMAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LP and REVCOR. [NC.. Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, V. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (improperly pleaded herein as GE INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY), Third-Party Defendants! Fourth-Party Plaintiffs, V. ELICA S.p.A.. fi’kJa FIME MOTOR DIVIS[ON. — ELICA S.p.A Fourth-Party Defendant/Fifth-Party Plaintiff SKF INDLSTRIES SpA.. Fifth-Party Defendant. Civil Action (CCC) No.: 2: 12-cv-00442 This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Fifth-Party Defendant SKF Industrie S.p.A. (SKF-haly”) to dismiss Fourth Party Defendant Elica. S.p.A.s (Elica”) Fifth-Party Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). (ECF No. 79). Elica opposed SKF-halv’s motion. (ECF No. 82). On January 20, 2015, Magistrate Judge James B. Clark Ill issued a Report and Recommendation that SKF-Italy’s motion he granted. (ECF No. 85). No objections have been filed thereto. The Court has considered the submissions of the parties, and Judge Clark’s Report and Recommendation, and for substantially the same reasons stated therein; IT IS on this day of , 2015 ORDERED that this Court adopts Judge Clark’s January 20, 2015 Report and Recommendation that SKF-Italy’ s motion be granted; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall terminate the Fifth-Party Complaint in this matter. SO ORDERED. CLAIRE C. CECCHI, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?