BENJAMIN v. EAST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
ORDER granting 48 Motion to Set Aside Default; that, Plaintiff shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Counterclaim no later than October 30, 2014; denying 52 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 10/20/14. (DD, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
VENETTA N. BENJAMIN,
Civil Action No. 12-774 (WJM)
EAST ORANGE POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Venetta
N. Benjamin’s motion to vacate entry of default [CM/ECF No. 48] and
Defendant/Counter-Claimant Shamsiddin Abdur-Raheem’s motion for default judgment.
[CM/ECF No. 52.] The motions are opposed. Based upon the following, the motion to
vacate entry of default is granted, and the motion for default judgment is denied.
1. Venetta N. Benjamin (“Planitiff”) filed this civil rights and wrongful death
action against Shamsiddin Abdur-Raheem (“Abdur-Raheem”), the East Orange Police
Department, and the City of East Orange. Plaintiff alleges that Abdur-Raheem physically
abused her, and kidnapped and murdered their daughter, Zara Abdur-Raheem. AbdurRaheem is currently incarcerated. Abdur-Raheem filed an Answer to Plaintiff’s
Complaint. On March 28, 2013, the Court granted in part and denied in part a motion to
dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. On
March 21, 2014, Abdur-Raheem filed an Answer to the Amended Complaint, which
includes a Counterclaim for assault and battery, defamation, and intentional infliction of
2. On May 27, 2014, entry of default was entered against Plaintiff on the
Counterclaim. On June 16, 2014, Plaintiff moved to set aside the entry of default. On
July 18, 2014, Abdur-Raheem moved for default judgment on his Counterclaim.
3. Federal Rule 55(c) provides that the Court “may set aside an entry of default for
good cause. . . .” The decision to vacate a default is left primarily to the discretion of the
district court. See United States v. $55,518.05 in U.S. Currency, 728 F.2d 192, 194 (3d
Cir. 1984). Courts disfavor defaults. Harad v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 839 F.2d 979, 982
(3d Cir. 1988). “Any doubt should be resolved in favor of the petition to set aside the
[default] so that cases may be decided on the merits.” Medunic v. Lederer, 533 F.2d 891,
894 (3d Cir. 1976).
4. The Court concludes that there is good cause to vacate the default. Plaintiff’s
Counsel submitted a certification stating that at the time Abdur-Raheem filed and served
his Counterclaim, Counsel had been tending to his father who was suffering from a
terminal illness. Counsel represents that his father passed away only days after the
Counterclaim was filed, and that thereafter his attention and time were devoted to making
funeral arrangements and responding to the surviving family’s needs. Upon consideration
of Counsel’s representations, the Court is more than satisfied that good cause to vacate
the default has been shown.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS on this 20th day of October 2014
ORDERED that, Plaintiff’s motion to vacate entry of default [CM/ECF No. 48] is
granted; and it is further
ORDERED that, Plaintiff shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the
Counterclaim no later than October 30, 2014; and it is further
ORDERED that, Abdur-Raheem’s motion for default judgment [CM/ECF No. 52]
on his Counterclaim is denied; and it is further
ORDERED that, Counsel for Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on
Defendant Shamsiddin Abdur-Raheem within 5 days by regular mail.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?