OYEDEJI v. HUDSON COUNTY et al
OPINION & ORDER granting 113 Motion to Dismiss for failure to provide an affidavit of merit, and as to Defendant Emergency Medical Associates only, the Third Party Complaint is dismissed w/prejudice. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 5/4/16. (sr, )
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Civil Action No. 12-4270 (SRC)
OPINION & ORDER
HUDSON COUNTY et al.,
This matter comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss the Third Party Complaint
(“TPC”) for failure to provide an affidavit of merit by Defendant/Third Party Defendant
Emergency Medical Associates (“EMA”). For the reasons stated below, the motion will be
Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs Hudson County, Hudson County Correctional Center,
and Oscar Aviles (collectively, the “Hudson TPPs”) filed a Third Party Complaint against Third
Party Defendants, Susan O’Brien, D.O., Emergency Medical Associates and Jersey City Medical
Center. EMA now moves to dismiss the TPC against it for failure to provide an affidavit of
EMA argues that the Third Party Complaint should be dismissed against it because Third
Party Plaintiffs failed to file the affidavit of merit required by N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2A:53A-27. The
docket shows that, on November 15, 2013, the Third Party Plaintiffs filed an affidavit of merit by
Dr. Sixsmith, stating that the care provided to Plaintiff by Defendants Susan O’Brien, D.O. and
Jersey City Medical Center fell outside of acceptable professional standards. The affidavit made
no reference to EMA.
In opposition, the Hudson TPPs first argue that the statute does not require that the
affidavit of merit identify a defendant by name, citing the decision of the Appellate Division in
Medeiros v. O'Donnell & Naccarato, Inc., 347 N.J. Super. 536, 540 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
2002). The problem for the Hudson TPPs is that, in Medeiros, the court found that it was
sufficient that the affidavit of merit identify the single defendant by a description. Id. at 542. In
the instant case, in contrast, there are multiple defendants, and the affidavit of merit contains
nothing from which this Court could infer that Dr. Sixsmith meant for it to assert that Emergency
Medical Associates had been negligent in the treatment of Plaintiff. The affidavit of merit
neither names nor otherwise describes EMA.
The Hudson TPPs failed to file the affidavit of merit required by N.J. Stat. Ann. §
2A:53A-27 against Defendant Emergency Medical Associates. As to Emergency Medical
Associates only, the motion to dismiss will be granted, and the Third Party Complaint against
Defendant Emergency Medical Associates will be dismissed with prejudice.
For the reasons above,
IT IS on this 4th day of May, 2016,
ORDERED that EMA’s motion to dismiss for failure to provide an affidavit of merit
(Docket Entry No. 113) is GRANTED; and, as to Defendant Emergency Medical Associates
only, the Third Party Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.
s/ Stanley R. Chesler
Stanley R. Chesler, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?