ALQANAWI v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
Filing
65
ORDER denying pltf's 48 Motion for Default Judgment; Plaintiffs may refile their motion within 30 days of a resolution of the matter against remaining non-defaulting Defendants. Signed by Judge Madeline C. Arleo on 7/21/2015. (nr, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
TARIQ ALQANAWI,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 13-1578
v.
ORDER
CITY OF PATERSON, et al.,
Defendants.
This matter having come before this Court by way of Plaintiff Tariq Alqanawi’s Motion
for Default Judgment against Defendant Mahmoud Rabboh [Dkt. No. 48];
and it appearing that Plaintiff filed a Complaint on March 14, 2013 [Dkt. No. 1] asserting
causes of action including various violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the
United States Constitution, the New Jersey State Constitution, the New Jersey Civil Rights Act,
and 42 U.S.C. § 1983;
and it appearing that the Complaint was filed against the City of Paterson, the Paterson
Police Department, Mahmoud Rabboh, and John and Jane Does 1-10;
and it appearing that Plaintiff seeks entry of default against only one defendant, Mahmoud
Rabboh;
and it appearing that “if default is entered against some defendants in a multi-defendant
case, the preferred practice is for the courts to withhold granting default judgment until the action
is resolved on its merits against non-defaulting defendants.” Animal Sci. Prods., Inc. v. China Nat.
Metals & Minerals Imp. & Exp. Corp., 596 F. Supp. 2d 842, 849 (D.N.J. 2008); see also F.T.C. v.
1
Preferred Platinum Servs. Network, LLC, 10-538, 2010 WL 3883403, at *2 (D.N.J. Sept. 28,
2010); 1
and it appearing that “the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but
fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason
for delay,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
and the Court having considered Plaintiff’s arguments;
IT IS on this 21st day of July, 2015,
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice;
and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiffs may refile their motion within 30 days of a resolution of the
matter against remaining non-defaulting Defendants.
/s/ Madeline Cox Arleo
Hon. Madeline Cox Arleo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
This principle applies with even greater force when liability is joint and several and not all
defendants have defaulted. See 10A Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 2690 (3d ed.).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?