Lu v. Weinberger
Filing
50
ORDER terminating w/out prejudice 45 Motion for Default Judgment; that, if Plaintiff wishes to move immediately for default judgment, Plaintiffshall resubmit his motion without including any claims not alleged in the Complaint; etc. Signed by Judge Madeline C. Arleo on 1/26/15. (DD, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
GAN SHI LU
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 13-1837
ORDER
ANDREW WEINBERGER
Defendant.
THIS MATTER having come before the Court by way of Plaintiff Gan Shi Lu’s Motion
for Default Judgment against Defendant Andrew Weinberger [Dkt. No. 45];
and it appearing that Plaintiff attempts to amend his Complaint in his Motion for Default
Judgment to assert additional claims not mentioned in the Complaint; 1
and it further appearing that pleadings adding new claims against a party must be served
on that party pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5(a)(2) and 4;
and a motion for default judgment not being the appropriate vehicle to add claims not
asserted in the Complaint;
IT IS on this 26th day of January, 2015,
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is terminated without prejudice
to refile; and it is further
ORDERED that, if Plaintiff wishes to move immediately for default judgment, Plaintiff
shall resubmit his motion without including any claims not alleged in the Complaint; and it is
1
“Just to updating on the claims Plaintiff didn't include the money which Mr.Weinberger borrowed and defendant
asked for cash from Email.” (Dkt. No. 45 at 1; see also Dkt. No. 45-1 at 5-7).
further
ORDERED that, if Plaintiff moves to amend his Complaint to add another cause of action,
(1) Plaintiff must file the Amended Complaint with the Court and send a copy to Defendant’s last
known address and (2) Defendant’s Answer will be due 21 days from the date of electronic filing
of the Amended Complaint.
s/ Madeline Cox Arleo
Hon. Madeline Cox Arleo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?