Lu v. Weinberger

Filing 50

ORDER terminating w/out prejudice 45 Motion for Default Judgment; that, if Plaintiff wishes to move immediately for default judgment, Plaintiffshall resubmit his motion without including any claims not alleged in the Complaint; etc. Signed by Judge Madeline C. Arleo on 1/26/15. (DD, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY GAN SHI LU Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 13-1837 ORDER ANDREW WEINBERGER Defendant. THIS MATTER having come before the Court by way of Plaintiff Gan Shi Lu’s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Andrew Weinberger [Dkt. No. 45]; and it appearing that Plaintiff attempts to amend his Complaint in his Motion for Default Judgment to assert additional claims not mentioned in the Complaint; 1 and it further appearing that pleadings adding new claims against a party must be served on that party pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5(a)(2) and 4; and a motion for default judgment not being the appropriate vehicle to add claims not asserted in the Complaint; IT IS on this 26th day of January, 2015, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is terminated without prejudice to refile; and it is further ORDERED that, if Plaintiff wishes to move immediately for default judgment, Plaintiff shall resubmit his motion without including any claims not alleged in the Complaint; and it is 1 “Just to updating on the claims Plaintiff didn't include the money which Mr.Weinberger borrowed and defendant asked for cash from Email.” (Dkt. No. 45 at 1; see also Dkt. No. 45-1 at 5-7). further ORDERED that, if Plaintiff moves to amend his Complaint to add another cause of action, (1) Plaintiff must file the Amended Complaint with the Court and send a copy to Defendant’s last known address and (2) Defendant’s Answer will be due 21 days from the date of electronic filing of the Amended Complaint. s/ Madeline Cox Arleo Hon. Madeline Cox Arleo UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?