LOCAL 888, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS v. NOVUS FINE CHEMICALS, LLC
Filing
7
ORDER that Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Default Judgment is denied without prejudice, etc. Plaintiff may refile a default judgment motion in compliance with this Courts Local Civil Rules, within 30 days of this order. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 3/17/14. (gmd, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
MARTIN LUTHER KING
COURTHOUSE
50 WALNUT ST.
ROOM 5076
NEWARK, NJ 07101
973-297-4887
CHAMBERS OF
ESTHER SALAS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
March 17, 2014
LETTER ORDER
Re:
Local 888, United Food and Commercial Workers v. Novus Fine
Chemicals, LLC
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02783 (ES)
Dear Counsel:
Pending before this Court is Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. (D.E. No. 6).
Local Civil Rule 7.1 provides that “[n]o application will be heard unless the
moving papers and a brief, prepared in accordance with L.Civ.R. 7.2 . . . are filed with
the Clerk . . . .” L.Civ.R. 7.1(d)(1) (emphasis added). Local Civil Rule 7.1 further states
that “[i]n lieu of filing any brief . . . a party may file a statement that no brief is necessary
and the reasons therefor.” L.Civ.R. 7.1(d)(4). Plaintiff, however, has failed to file either
a brief or a statement that no brief is necessary. (See D.E. No. 6). Plaintiff’s default
judgment motion is therefore improper under the Local Civil Rules. See Developers Sur.
& Indemnity, Co., v. NDK Gen. Contractors, Inc., No. 06-0086, 2007 WL 542381, at *2
(D.N.J. Feb. 15, 2007) (“Because Plaintiff’s application [for default judgment] does not
meet the requirements of Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court will not hear Plaintiff’s
application.”).
Plaintiff’s motion is therefore denied without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile a
default judgment motion, in compliance with this Court’s Local Civil Rules, within thirty
(30) days of this order.
SO ORDERED.
s/Esther Salas
Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?