ADU et al v. A.T.I. U.S.A., INC. et al

Filing 13

Opinion and ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 11/4/13. (jd, )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

MARGARET ADU, et a!.,
Civil Action No. 13-3835 (JLL)

Plaintiff,
v.

OPINION

A.T.I. U.S.A., INC., et al.,
Defendants.

LINARES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendants A.T.I. U.S.A. and CMA
CGM’s requests for entry of dismissal of Plaintiffs Complaint with prejudice for failure to file
an amended complaint by the deadline specified by the Court in its August 23, 2013 and August
28, 2013 Orders.

{CM/ECF Nos. 6, 8.)

Although Plaintiffs attorney no longer represents

Plaintiff as of October 28, 2013, [CM/ECF No. 121, since she represented Plaintiff as of the dates
of the Court’s previous Orders, the Court assumes that Plaintiffs attorney informed Plaintiff of
the deadlines to amend when those Orders were issued. Therefore, because Plaintiff failed to file
a Complaint within the thirty-day time period specified by this Court in its aforementioned
Orders,
IT IS on this

day of November, 2013,

ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

States District Judge