ZAIDI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 6

ORDER denying 2 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge William J. Martini on 12/23/13. (gh, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

SYEI) ZAIDI.

Civil No. 13-4443 (WJM)
Petitioner.
v.

ORDER

UNITED STATES JOF AMERICA.
Respondents.

MARTINL District Judge:
1, On February 4, 2013, Syed Zaidi signed, and presumably handed to prison officials for
mailing to the Clerk, apro se motion to vacate a sentence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255. imposed

hvjudgrnent of this Court filed on February 18, 2011, in United States v. Zaidi. Crim. No. 10-0409
(WJM) judgment (D.N.J. Feb. 18, 2011), aff’ 460 F.App’x 137 (3d Cir. 2012). See Zaidi v,

United States, Civ. No. 13-0876 (WJM) motion at ECF No. I (D.N.J. filed Feb. 11,2013). The
motion raised three grounds, with subparts.
2. By Order filed on February 20, 2013, this Court notified Zaidi, in accordance with

United States v. Miller, 197 F.3d 644 (3d Cir. 1999), that a person seeking relief in federal court
from confinement resulting from a conviction in federal court must include in a single petition

under

§

2255 all potential claims for which he or she desires to seek review and relief; this Court

asked Zaidi if he would like his

§

2255 motion ruled upon as filed, or to withdraw the

motion and file an all-inclusive

§

2255 motion, subject to the one-year limitations period under

§

2255

2255. See Zak/i v. United States, Civ. No. 13-0876 (WJM) Order at ECF No. 2.
3. By letter filed and dated April 5, 2013, Michael Orozco advised this Court that he
represents Syed Zaidi in the

§

2255 case No. 13-0867 (WJM) and notified this Court that, in

§

response to the Order filed February 20, 2013, Zaidi elected to withdraw his pleading and file an
all-inclusive
No. 4.

§ 2255 motion. See Zaidi v. United States,

Civ. No. 13-0876 (WJM) motion at ECF

In accordance with this letter, Civil No. 1 3-0876 (WJM) was terminated.
4. On July 10. 2013. through counsel, Zaidi filed a Notice of Motion to File Motion and

Exhibits Under Seal. See Zaidi v. United Stares, Civ. No. 13-0876 (WJM) motion at ECF No. 5.
In the motion. Zaidi asked for an order “directing that Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside, Vacate, or
Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255, Memorandum of Law in Support, Certifications in

Support, and supporting Exhibits, be filed Under Seal, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3(c).” Id.
The motion was supported by the certification of Michael Orozco. Contrary to the requirements
of Local Civil Rule 5.3(c), Zaidi did not describe the factors set forth in Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(2).
and he did not electronically file the materials deemed confidential under seal with the designation
“confidential materials” submitted on motion to seal, as required by Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(3).
5. On July 23, 2013, through counsel, Zaidi filed in the instant matter, Civil No. 13-4443
(W.JM). a two-page document labeled “Notice of Motion to Set Aside, Vacate, or Correct
Petitioner’s Sentence.” (Notice of Motion, ECF No. 1.) The notice of motion seeks an order to
set aside, vacate, or correct Zaidi’s sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§

2255 and relies “upon the

following as yet un-filed documents: Memorandum of Law, Certification of Petitioner, further
Exhibits, and further Certification of Counsel, to be submitted upon resolution of Petitioner’s
Notice of Motion to File Motion and Exhibits Under Seal pursuant to L. Civ. R. 5.3(c).” Id. at 1.
6, Contrary to the requirements of Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Motions,
Zaidi’s motion in Civil No. 13-4443 (WJM) (ECF No. 2) does not specify

any

ground for relief,

set forth the facts supporting each ground. and specify the relief requested. See 28 U.S.C.
Rule 2(b).

§ 2255

7. On July 24, 2013, Zaidi filed a “Notice of Motion to File Motion and Exhibits Under
Seal.” (ECF No. 2.) He seeks an order “directing that Petitioner’s Motion to Set Aside. Vacate,
or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255, Memorandum of Law in Support. Certifications

in Support, and supporting Exhibits, be filed Under Seal, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3(c).” Id.
8. Local Rule 5.3(c) governs motions to seal. Local Rule 5.3(c)(2) requires a motion to
seal to “describe (a) the nature of the materials or proceedings at issue, (b) the legitimate private or
public interests which warrant the relief sought, (c) the clearly defined and serious injury that
would result if the relief sought is not granted, and (d) why a less restrictive alternative to the relief
sought is not available.” Loc. Civ. R. 5.3(c)(2).
9. Although the attorney’s certification attached to the motion to seal arguably satisfies
section 5,3(c)(2)(c),’ Zaidi’s motion to seal does not comply with Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(2)
because he does not describe the factors set forth in section 5.3(c)(2)(a), (b), or (d).
10. Local Rule 5.3(c)(3) provides: “Any materials deemed confidential by a party or
parties

...

shall be filed electronically under the designation ‘confidential materials’ and shall

remain sealed until such time as the motion is decided.” Loc. Civ. R. 5.3(c)(3). The explanatory
notes explain that this “subparagraph is intended to allow confidential materials to be filed and
remain under seal until a motion to seal or otherwise restrict public access is ruled on.”

Explanatory Note, Loc. Civ, R. 5.3, Subparagraph (c)(3).
11. Zaidi’s motion to seal does not comply with Local Rule 5.3(c)(3) because Zaidi did
not lile under temporary seal the materials he deems confidential.

Based on the foregoing,

“It is my belief that if this information is made part of the public record of these proceedings then
Petitioner’s life would be in danger.” (Certification. ECF No. 2-1 at 2.)
3

________________________,

IT IS on this

day of

ORDERED

that the motion to seal (ECF No. 2) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply
with Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(2) and (3).

4