SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC. v. AVM ENTERPRISES, LLC et al

Filing 11

OPINION and ORDER denying 8 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Katharine S. Hayden on 9/30/14. (rg, )

Download PDF
Not for Publication United States District Court for the District of New Jersey SUPER 8 WORLDWIDE, INC., Plaintiff, v. AVM ENTERPRISES, LLC, ASHESH PATEL, VIJAY PATEL, and MINESH PATEL, Civil No.: 13-4482 (KSH) Opinion and Order Defendants. Katharine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J. This matter comes before the Court upon plaintiff Super 8 Worldwide, Inc.’s (“Super 8”) motion for entry of default judgment [D.E. 8] against defendants AVM Enterprises, LLC, Ashesh Patel, Vijay Patel and Minesh Patel (“Defendants”). The Court notes as follows: • • • Default was entered against Defendants for failure to plead or otherwise defend on November 18, 2013 and Super 8 moved for entry of final judgment by default on January 28, 2014; Super 8’s submission on the motion failed to adequately describe its efforts in serving Defendants via certified and ordinary mail, and the Court thereafter ordered Super 8 to file “documentation in support of their affidavits of diligence as to the attempted service upon the defaulting defendants, including return receipts, certified mail receipts, and/or any other relevant proofs.” [D.E. 9]; Super 8’s supplemental certification and annexed exhibits, filed with the Court on March 25, 2014 [D.E. 10], were similarly deficient. Based on the foregoing, the Court denies the motion for entry of default judgment [D.E. 8] as deficient without prejudice to re-filing with the proper documentation. SO ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2014. /s/ Katharine S. Hayden Katharine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?