UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE 2010 JEEP WRANGLER et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 7 Motion for Default Judgment & Final order of Forfeiture***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 1/30/2014. (nr, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Civ. No. 2:13-6099 (KM) Plaintiff, v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE : ONE 2010 JEEP WRANGLER (VIN: 1J4HA5H1 1AL22 1613), ONE 2009 NISSAN 370Z (VIN: WAUFAFL8AA 172602); $20,000 in UNITED STATES CURRENCY Defendants in rem. THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court by Plaintiff, the United Peter States of America, on a Motion for Default Judgment, Docket No. 7; and ation in W. Gaeta, Assistant United States Attorney having filed a Declar 7-1), Support of Default Judgment and Final Order of Forfeiture (Docket No. ty for including a copy of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem, Warran of Arrest In Rem, and Notice of Forfeiture (Exhibit A) and the Declaration of Civil Publication and Advertisement Certification Report of the Notice and Forfeiture (Exhibit B); and the Court having considered the moving papers the entire case file; and IT APPEARING that on October 11, 2013, a Verified Complaint for ty, Forfeiture In Rem was filed in this Court against the defendant proper Nissan namely one 2010 Jeep Wrangler, VIN: 1J4HA5H 1 1AL22 1613, one 2009 cy 370Z, VIN: WAUFAFL8AA1726O2, and $20,000 in United States curren 577 seized from Safe Deposit Box #308 at Hudson City Savings Bank, Lakehurst Road, Toms River, New Jersey to enforce to provisions of 21 U.S.C. all Section 881(a)(4), which subjects to forfeiture to the United States or are conveyances, including aircraft, vehicles, or vessels, which are used, rtation, intended for use, to transport, or in any manner to facilitate the transpo ce in sale receipt, possession, or concealment of a controlled dangerous substan which violation of 21 U.S.C. Section 801, et seq., and/or 21 U.S.C. 881(a)(6), 1 securities, and other subjects to forfeiture all moneys, negotiable instruments, in exchange for a things of value furnished or intended to be furnished 801, et seq., and all controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. Section proceeds traceable to such an exchange; and st In Rem issued IT APPEARING that, pursuant to the Warrant for Arre United States Marshal by the clerk of the Court on October 15, 2013, the Service seized the defendant property; and inistrative claim IT APPEARING that a letter of representation and adm Offices of Jonathan F. was received from Thomas V. Campo, Esq. (of The Law y 07701), on behalf of Marshall, 157 Broad St., Suite 111, Red Bank, New Jerse of the defendant potential claimaint Tyler Sargent, regarding the forfeiture property; and States sent the IT APPEARING that on October 22, 2013, the United st In Rem, and a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem, Warrant for Arre ested to potential Notice of Forfeiture by certified mail, return receipt requ Esq.; and claimant Tyler Sargent, do his attorney Thomas V. Campo, Complaint for IT APPEARING that on October 24, 2013, the Verified of Forfeiture were Forfeiture In Rem, Warrant for Arrest In Rem, and Notice ney Thomas V. received by potential claimant Tyler Sargent, c/ o his attor Campo, Esq.; and 3, stated that a IT APPEARING that the Notice of Forfeiture, Docket No. order to contest the claim had to be filed no later than November 26, 2013 in forfeiture; and ed on an official IT APPEARING that notice of Civil Forfeiture was post 30 consecutive government internet website (www.forfeiture.gov) for at least G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the days, beginning on September 19, 2013, as required by Rule Asset Forfeiture Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Actions; and defendant IT APPEARING that, in order to avoid forfeiture of the st, the defendant property, any person claiming an interest in, or right again ying the specific property must file a claim under penalty of perjury identif nt’s interest in property claimed, identifying the claimant and stating the claima lemental Rules for the property in the manner set forth in Rule G(5) of the Supp 2 of Civil Admiralty or Maritime and Asset Forfeiture Claims, Federal Rules such Procedure and 18 U.S.C. Section 983(a)(4)(A), except that in no event may aboveclaim be filed later than 60 days after the first day of publication on the claim, referenced official government internet website, and having filed such a the filing must also file an answer to the complaint not later than 20 days after of the claim; and the IT APPEARING that no claim has been filed by any person within alty or time permitted by Rule G(5) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admir the Maritime and Asset Forfeiture Claims, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for defendant property in this matter; IT IS this 30th day of January 2014, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that a Default Judgment and Final Order of ler, Forfeiture is granted against the defendant properly—one 2010 Jeep Wrang VIN: 370Z, Nissan 2009 one 1J4HA5H11AL221613, VIN: Safe WAUFAFL8AA1726O2, and $20,000 in United States currency seized from Toms Deposit Box #308 at Hudson City Savings Bank, 577 Lakehurst Road, ty shall River, New Jersey, and no right, title, or interest in the defendant proper exist in any other party; and it is further ing ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that any and all forfeited funds, includ ts, but not limited to currency, currency equivalents, and certificates of deposi e’s as well as any income derived as a result of the United States Marshal Servic and management of any property forfeited herein, after the payment of costs of the expenses incurred in connection with the forfeiture and disposition al forfeited property, shall be deposited forthwith by the United States Marsh ance Service into the Department of Justice Asset Forfeiture Fund, in accord with the law. / kJ( KEVIN MCNULTY United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?