INGRIS v. BOROUGH OF CALDWELL et al

Filing 119

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 104 Motion to Dismiss filed by FAIRFIELD PROSECUTOR, FAIRFIELD TOWNSHIP, 106 Motion to Dismiss, filed by JOSEPH DEFURIA, PAUL MILANI, APICELLA, ARNOLD, MURRAY, DASSING, BONGIORNO, BUTCHYK, PELLEGRINO, BOROUGH OF CALDWELL, 105 Motion to Dismiss filed by TOSCANO LAW FIRM are denied without prejudice as MOOT; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed. ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 1/20/2016. (seb)

Download PDF
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY PETER INGRIS, Plaintiff, v. BOROUGH OF CALDWELL, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No.: 14-855 (ES)(MAH) ORDER SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court are certain motions to dismiss. (See D.E. Nos. 104, 105 & 106). On January 4, 2016, however, Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer issued a Report and Recommendation that the Undersigned dismiss this action for failure to prosecute. (D.E. No. 117). The parties had 14 days to file and serve any objections to Judge Hammer’s Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1(c)(2). To date, no party has filed an objection. Having carefully reviewed the docket in this matter and Judge Hammer’s Report and Recommendation, and for the reasons stated in Judge Hammer’s Report and Recommendation, IT IS on this 20th day of January 2016, ORDERED that this Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hammer’s Report and Recommendation, (D.E. No. 117), as the Opinion of this Court; and it is further ORDERED that the pending motions filed by certain defendants, (D.E. Nos. 104, 105 & 106), are DENIED without prejudice as MOOT; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED. s/ Esther Salas Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?