KING v. GALANO et al

Filing 30

ORDER granting 27 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED; adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge William J. Martini on 10/28/15. (gh, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
DAVID KING,
Civ. No. 14-1691 (WJM)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

MICHAEL GALANO, et al.,
Defendants.

A Report and Recommendation was filed on September 18, 2015
recommending that the undersigned grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack
of prosecution. See ECF No. 28. The parties were notified that they had fourteen
(14) days to submit objections and responses to the Report and Recommendation
pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1(c)(2). No objection or response having been
received by this Court, 1 and the Court having reviewed the Report and
Recommendation de novo, and good cause appearing;
IT IS on this 28th day of October 2015, hereby,
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mark
Falk is adopted as the Opinion of this Court; and it is further
1

The Report and Recommendation was sent to Plaintiff’s last known address, but was later returned as
undeliverable. However, it is Plaintiff’s responsibility to notify the Court of a change of address. The Court will
therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, notwithstanding the fact that it was returned as undeliverable. See,
e.g., L. Civ. R. 10.1(a) (“Counsel and/or unrepresented parties must advise the Court of any change in their or their
client’s address within seven days of being apprised of such change by filing a notice of said change with the
Clerk.”); Calvaruso v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 14-4515, *1 (D.N.J. June 9, 2015) (adopting report and
recommendation that was returned as undeliverable).

1

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss GRANTED

/s/ William J. Martini
WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J.
cc:

The Hon. Mark Falk, U.S.M.J.

2