Filing 387

ORDER that REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 386 is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. The motion re 307 for default judgement is GRANTED etc. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 3/12/2020. (bt, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY BANK OF HOPE, Civ. No. 14-1770 (KM) Plaintiff, ORDER V. MIYE CHON, et al., Defendants. ph A. Dickson, IT APPEARING that, on February 18, 2020, the Hon. Jose ion (DE 386) that the U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed a Report and Recommendat for a default Court grant the unopposed motion (DE 307) of Suk Joon Ryu for defamation, with judgment against defendant Miye Chon on a crossclaim damages to be determined; and otherwise, has IT APPEARING that no objection to the R&R, timely or and been filed, see Fed. R. Civ. P.72(b); L. Civ. 1?. 72.lc(2); ndation de novo THE COURT having reviewed the Report and Recomme despite the lack of an objection; and d, and that no IT APPEARING that Judge Dickson’s reasoning is soun rent; error of law, clear error of fact, or abuse of discretion is appa IT IS THEREFORE this 12th day of March, 2020, 386) is ADOPTED ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (DE 1?. Civ. P. 72(b)(3);’ and and AFFIRMED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. it is further or in part, the “A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 1 Report and Recommendation, ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the that t is GRANTED; (a) The motion (DE 307) for default judgmen shall be deferred, at the (b) Determination of the amount of damages determined in conjunction suggestion of counsel for Mr. Ryu, and be , Ryu u. Bank of with, or following, the resolution of a related case Hope, Civ. No. 19-18998 (KM/JBC) KEVIN MCNULTY United States District Judge (stating that the district court judge see also US. u. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 680 (1980) istrate’s recommendation). has broad discretion in accepting or rejecting the mag 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?