PEREZ et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al

Filing 110

ORDER adopting 108 Judge Clark's R&R and DENYING 103 Defendant's motion to enforce settlement. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 10/26/20. (jc, )

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-02279-CCC-JBC Document 110 Filed 10/26/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 2437 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ALEJANDRO VINCENTE PEREZ and CATHY HANENBERG PEREZ, Plaintiffs, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Civil Action No.: 14-cv-02279 ORDER Defendant. CECCHI, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”) to enforce settlement. ECF No. 103. Pro se Plaintiffs Alejandro Vincente Perez and Cathy Hanenberg Perez (“Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion. ECF No. 104. On September 21, 2020, Magistrate Judge James B. Clark, III, issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) that Defendant’s motion be denied. ECF No. 108. The deadline to file objections to the R&R was October 5, 2020. No objections have been filed thereto. The Court has considered the submissions as well as Judge Clark’s R&R, and for substantially the same reasons stated therein: IT IS on this 26th day of October, 2020: ORDERED that this Court adopts Judge Clark’s R&R (ECF No. 108); and it is further ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to enforce settlement (ECF No. 103) is DENIED. SO ORDERED. CLAIRE C. CECCHI, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?