PEREZ et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
Filing
110
ORDER adopting 108 Judge Clark's R&R and DENYING 103 Defendant's motion to enforce settlement. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 10/26/20. (jc, )
Case 2:14-cv-02279-CCC-JBC Document 110 Filed 10/26/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 2437
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
ALEJANDRO VINCENTE PEREZ and
CATHY HANENBERG PEREZ,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Civil Action No.: 14-cv-02279
ORDER
Defendant.
CECCHI, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. (“Defendant”) to enforce settlement. ECF No. 103. Pro se Plaintiffs Alejandro Vincente
Perez and Cathy Hanenberg Perez (“Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion. ECF
No. 104. On September 21, 2020, Magistrate Judge James B. Clark, III, issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) that Defendant’s motion be denied. ECF No. 108. The deadline to file
objections to the R&R was October 5, 2020. No objections have been filed thereto.
The Court has considered the submissions as well as Judge Clark’s R&R, and for
substantially the same reasons stated therein:
IT IS on this 26th day of October, 2020:
ORDERED that this Court adopts Judge Clark’s R&R (ECF No. 108); and it is further
ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to enforce settlement (ECF No. 103) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
CLAIRE C. CECCHI, U.S.D.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?