SHARKEY v. VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC.

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 31 Report and Recommendations, granting 21 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by PETER SHARKEY ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 4/13/2015. (nr, )

Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY PETER SHARKEY, Civil Action No. 14-2788(JLL) (JAD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC., Defendant. LINARES, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of Plaintiffs motion to remand the matter to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). This Court referred Plaintiffs application to the Honorable Joseph A. Dickson, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Dickson filed a Report and Recommendation in connection with said application on March 18, 2015. In particular, Magistrate Judge Dickson recommended that Plaintiffs motion to remand be granted and Plaintiffs request for attorney’s fees be denied. On April 1, 2015, Defendant filed an Objection to Magistrate Judge Dickson’s March 18, 2015 Report and Recommendation. The Court decides this matter without oral argument pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth in the Court’s corresponding Opinion, IT IS on this 13th day of April, 2015 ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Dickson, filed on March 18, 2015 [Docket Entry No. 31] is hereby ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [Docket Entry No. 21] is GRANTED. The matter is hereby remanded to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County; and it is further ORDERED that this case CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. JO/L LINARES U4’S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?