Filing 17

ORDER denying petitioner's 9 Motion for Default Judgment ; denying petitioner's 10 Motion to Stay deportation, etc.. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 6/2/2015. (nr, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JERMAINE GILKES, Civil Action No. 14-3209 (JLL) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROY L. HENDRICKS, et at., Defendants. IT APPEARING THAT: 1. On or about August 26, 2014, Petitioner Jermaine Gilkes filed his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 6). 2. On October 17, 2014, this Court issued an Order directing Respondents to file a response to the § 2254 petition within 45 days. (ECF No. 7). 3. Respondents, however, apparently never received that initial order. (See ECF No. 12). 4. On January 29, 2015, Petitioner filed a motion for default judgment which this Court did not receive until February 5, 2015. (ECF No. 9). 5. On January 29, 2015, Petitioner also filed a motion to stay his deportation, which was not received by this Court until February 9, 2015. (ECF No. 10). 6. Petitioner, however, was deported to Guyana on February 3, 2015, before the Court received either motion. (See ECF No. 16). 7. This Court issued a second order to answer on March 18, 2015, which Respondents have received and to which they have responded. (ECF No. 11, 12, 13). 8. On May 19, 2015, Respondents filed their response to this habeas petition. (ECF No. 15). IT IS THEREFORE on this day of June, 2015, ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 9) is DENIED as Respondents have answered the petition; and it is further ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Stay Deportation (ECF No. 10) is DENIED as Plaintiff had already been deported by the time the motion was received by the Court; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon the Respondents electronically and upon Petitioner by regular U.S. mail. Hon. Jpe Lrnares Unik States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?