JOOBLES, LLC v. DIRECT CLEANERS SUPPLY,INC. et al
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by JNS INVESTMENTS, INC., SON HA, 35 Report and Recommendations, The R&R of Magistrate Judge Mannion 35 is ADOPTED, as modified, as the conclusions of law of this Court. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 5/20/2015. (anr)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
JOOBLES,
TRADING,
LLC
d/b/a/
JOOBLES
Civil Action No. 14-cv-3792
Plaintiff,
(SDW) (SCM)
v.
DIRECT CLEANERS SUPPLY, INC.; CSD
GULF, INC. D/B/A/ DIRECT CLEANERS
SUPPLY; JNS INVESTMENTS, INC..
D/B/A EAGLE POLY; NHAM TRAN,
INDIVIDUALLY; SON HA,
INDIVIDUALLY,
ORDER
May 20, 2015
Defendants.
WIGENTON, District Judge.
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation filed on March 10, 2015 (“R&R”) by
Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion (“Magistrate Judge Mannion”), recommending that
Defendant Son Ha’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (“Motion to Dismiss”) 1 be
DENIED. (Dkt. No. 35.) No objections have been filed to the R&R.
This Court has reviewed the reasons set forth by Magistrate Judge Mannion in the R&R
and the other documents in this matter.
As such, this Court will hereby vacate the default judgment entered against Defendant Ha.
Based on the foregoing, and for good cause shown, it is also hereby
ORDERED that the R&R of Magistrate Judge Mannion (Dkt. No. 35) is ADOPTED, as
modified, as the conclusions of law of this Court.
1
This Motion to Dismiss was filed by JNS Investments, Inc. (“JNS”) and Son Ha; however, JNS is not represented
by counsel in this matter, and as corporations may not appear pro se, Magistrate Judge Mannion terminated the Motion
to Dismiss with respect to JNS. (See Dkt. Nos. 19, 31.)
1
SO ORDERED.
s/ Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J.
Orig: Clerk
cc:
Parties
Magistrate Judge Mannion
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?