VICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Filing 2

MEMORANDUM/ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this case, without filing the motion; that the Clerk of the Court shall forward Petitioner a blank section 2255 form AO243 (modified): DNJ-Habeas-004 (Rev. 01-2014); that t he Clerks service of the blank section 2255 form shall not be construed as this Courts finding that the motion is or is not timely, or that Petitioners claims are or are not procedurally defaulted; that if Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he sh all so notify the Court, in a writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court, that upon receipt of a writing from Petitioner stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and a complete, signed petition, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case; etc. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 7/17/14. (DD, )

Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION CLOSED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CHARLES VICK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. : : : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 14-4240 (FSH) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pro se Petitioner Charles Vick, a prisoner confined at the Federal Medical Center in Butner, North Carolina, seeks to file a motion to vacate pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Local Civil Rule 81.2 provides: Unless prepared by counsel, . . . motions under 28 U.S.C. §2255 shall be in writing (legibly handwritten in ink or typewritten), signed by the petitioner or movant, on forms supplied by the Clerk. L.Civ.R. 81.2(a). Petitioner did not use the habeas form supplied by the Clerk for section 2255 motions, i.e., AO243 (modified): DNJ-Habeas-004 (Rev. 01-2014). THEREFORE, it is on this 17th day of July, 2014; ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case, without filing the motion; Petitioner is informed that administrative termination is not a “dismissal” for purposes of the statute of limitations, and that if the case is reopened, it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally filed timely, see Papotto v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 731 F.3d 265, 275 (2013) (distinguishing administrative terminations from 1 dismissals); Jenkins v. Superintendent of Laurel Highlands, 705 F.3d 80, 84 n.2 (2013) (describing prisoner mailbox rule generally); Dasilva v. Sheriff’s Dep’t., 413 F. App’x 498, 502 (3rd Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (“[The] statute of limitations is met when a [motion] is submitted to the clerk before the statute runs ….”); and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall forward Petitioner a blank section 2255 form— AO243 (modified): DNJ-Habeas-004 (Rev. 01-2014); and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk’s service of the blank section 2255 form shall not be construed as this Court’s finding that the motion is or is not timely, or that Petitioner’s claims are or are not procedurally defaulted; and it is further ORDERED that if Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in a writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court, M.L. King, Jr. Federal Bldg. & U.S. Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, New Jersey, 07102, within 30 days of the date of entry of this Memorandum and Order; Petitioner’s writing shall include a complete, signed habeas petition on the appropriate form; and it is further ORDERED that upon receipt of a writing from Petitioner stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and a complete, signed petition, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case; and it is finally ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order upon Petitioner by regular U.S. mail. s/ Faith S. Hochberg FAITH S. HOCHBERG United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?