Dantes v. Indecomm Holdings, Inc.
Filing
53
ORDER ADOPTING 51 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND TRANSFERRING CASE. This matter shall be transferred to the United Stated District Court for the District of New Jersey. Signed by Chief Judge J. Daniel Breen on 8/19/18. (Breen, J.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
EASTERN DIVISION
LISA DANTES, on behalf of herself
and those similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 1:13-CV-1290-JDB-egb
INDECOMM HOLDINGS, INC.,
d/b/a INDECOMM GLOBAL SERVICES,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND TRANSFERRING CASE
_____________________________________________________________________________
This action was brought by the Plaintiff, Lisa Dantes, on behalf of herself and others similarly
situated, on October 23, 2013, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Defendant,
Indecomm Holdings, Inc., d/b/a Indecomm Global Services, moved to transfer the case to the United
States District Court for the District of New Jersey, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1404. (D.E. 12.) The
motion was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge, who recommended that the case be
transferred as requested. (D.E. 51.) The parties have filed a joint notice of non-objection to the
report and recommendation. (D.E. 52.)
The Court has carefully reviewed the report and recommendation and the relevant materials
in the file and finds the recommendation correct in all respects. Accordingly, the report and
recommendation is ADOPTED as the order of the Court and this matter shall be transferred to the
United Stated District Court for the District of New Jersey. All other pending motions will be
handled by the transferee court.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of August 2014.
s/ J. DANIEL BREEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?