GAGE v. PROVENZANO et al

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Provenzano are dismissed w/prejudice. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 5/19/15. (sr, )

Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY THOMAS I. GAGE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 14-5700(JLL) (JAD) ORDER SHERIFF FRANK J. PROVENZANO, et a!., Defendants. LINARES, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of Magistrate Judge Dickson’s November 24, 2014 Order to Show Cause why this action should not be dismissed [ECF No. 9]. Magis trate Judge Dickson filed a Report and Recommendation in connection with the Order to Show Cause on April 24, 2015 [ECF No. 19]. In particular, Magistrate Judge Dickson recommended that Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Provenzano be dismissed with prejudice and that Plaintiff be permitted to proceed at this time with his claims against Defendant Leffert. On May 5, 2015, Plaintiff filed an Objection to Magistrate Judge Dickson’s April 24, 2015 Report and Recommendation. The Court decides this matter without oral argument pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth in the Court’s corresp onding Opinion. IT IS on this day of May, 2015 ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Dickson, filed on April 24, 2015 [Docket Entry No. 19] is hereby ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Provenzano are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. JOSL. LINARES US. DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?