GAGE v. PROVENZANO et al
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Provenzano are dismissed w/prejudice. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 5/19/15. (sr, )
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
THOMAS I. GAGE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 14-5700(JLL) (JAD)
ORDER
SHERIFF FRANK J. PROVENZANO, et a!.,
Defendants.
LINARES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court by way of Magistrate Judge Dickson’s November 24,
2014 Order to Show Cause why this action should not be dismissed [ECF No. 9]. Magis
trate
Judge Dickson filed a Report and Recommendation in connection with the Order to Show
Cause
on April 24, 2015 [ECF No. 19]. In particular, Magistrate Judge Dickson recommended
that
Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Provenzano be dismissed with prejudice and that
Plaintiff be
permitted to proceed at this time with his claims against Defendant Leffert. On May 5,
2015,
Plaintiff filed an Objection to Magistrate Judge Dickson’s April 24, 2015 Report and
Recommendation. The Court decides this matter without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 78 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth in the Court’s corresp
onding
Opinion.
IT IS on this
day of May, 2015
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Dickson,
filed on
April 24, 2015 [Docket Entry No. 19] is hereby ADOPTED as the findings of
fact and
conclusions of law of this Court; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Provenzano are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JOSL. LINARES
US. DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?