WITHERSPOON v. MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION
Filing
2
OPINION. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 12/30/14. (jd, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
DESMOND WITHERSPOON,
Plaintiff,
v.
MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil Action No. 14-8022 (SRC)
OPINION
CHESLER, District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on the application filed by Plaintiff Desmond
Witherspoon to proceed in forma pauperis without fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The Court finds
that Plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status, yet his Complaint will be dismissed. The
Court must examine Plaintiff’s claim and dismiss it if frivolous or legally insufficient. 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2). Here, Plaintiff demands “License Restoration” for a cause of action “19:86
Limitations of Actions.” No further information is provided. As such, Plaintiff has failed to
state a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction and has failed to state a facially plausible
claim for relief. For the reasons provided in the Opinion for Civil Action No. 14-6296, Plaintiff
is on notice that he may be sanctioned if he continues to file unsubstantiated and repetitive
lawsuits. An appropriate Order will be filed.
s/Stanley R. Chesler
STANLEY R. CHESLER
United States District Judge
Dated: December 30, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?