Singh v. Holder et al
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER directing the deft's to file a responses to their motions on or before 11/30/2015, etc. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 11/16/2015. (nr, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
DEVENDRA SINGH,
Plaintiff,
Civ. No. 15-779 (KM)
V.
ERIC HOLDER, Jr., et al.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Defendants.
The plaintiff, Devendra Singh, is an immigration detainee currently held at the Hudson
County Correctional Facility in Kearney, New Jersey. He is proceeding pro se with a civil rights
complaint. Presently pending before the Court are three motions to dismiss filed by various
defendants.
The docket of this case does not show that Mr. Singh ever filed a response to any of the
three outstanding motions to dismiss. Defendants Eleonora Rivkin and Dante Cavallo have filed
a reply in further support of their motion to dismiss. (See Dkt. No. 34) Their reply refers to a
three-page response from plaintiff in opposition to their motion. Similarly, defendant Brian
Fischer’s motion to dismiss alludes to a response from the plaintiff. Neither of the responses to
which these defendants refer appears on the docket. I surmise that the plaintiff has served
responses on the defendants, but has not filed them with the clerk of the court.
Accordingly, IT IS this 16th day of November, 2015,
ORDERED that, on or before November 30, 2015, all moving defendants shall do the
Court the courtesy of furnishing copies of any responses to their motions that they have received;
and it is further
ORDERED that, on or before November 30, 2015, the plaintiff shall send to the clerk of
the Court copies of any response he has previously sent to the defendants so that they may be
filed. Failure to do so may result in the motion’s being decided based upon the defendants’ briefs
and any copies of plaintiff’s briefing that they supply.
I4LRcJbtIl
KEVIN MCNULTY
United States District Judge
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?