Singh v. Holder et al

Filing 36

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER directing the deft's to file a responses to their motions on or before 11/30/2015, etc. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 11/16/2015. (nr, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEVENDRA SINGH, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 15-779 (KM) V. ERIC HOLDER, Jr., et al. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendants. The plaintiff, Devendra Singh, is an immigration detainee currently held at the Hudson County Correctional Facility in Kearney, New Jersey. He is proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint. Presently pending before the Court are three motions to dismiss filed by various defendants. The docket of this case does not show that Mr. Singh ever filed a response to any of the three outstanding motions to dismiss. Defendants Eleonora Rivkin and Dante Cavallo have filed a reply in further support of their motion to dismiss. (See Dkt. No. 34) Their reply refers to a three-page response from plaintiff in opposition to their motion. Similarly, defendant Brian Fischer’s motion to dismiss alludes to a response from the plaintiff. Neither of the responses to which these defendants refer appears on the docket. I surmise that the plaintiff has served responses on the defendants, but has not filed them with the clerk of the court. Accordingly, IT IS this 16th day of November, 2015, ORDERED that, on or before November 30, 2015, all moving defendants shall do the Court the courtesy of furnishing copies of any responses to their motions that they have received; and it is further ORDERED that, on or before November 30, 2015, the plaintiff shall send to the clerk of the Court copies of any response he has previously sent to the defendants so that they may be filed. Failure to do so may result in the motion’s being decided based upon the defendants’ briefs and any copies of plaintiff’s briefing that they supply. I4LRcJbtIl KEVIN MCNULTY United States District Judge 9

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?