PANUNZIO LAW, P.C, v. DOMENEX AS et al
OPINION fld. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 6/1/15. (sr, )
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
PANUNZIO LAW, P.C.,
DOMENEX AS et al.,
Civil Action No. 15-1570 (SRC)
This matter comes before the Court on the motion for default judgment by Plaintiff
Panunzio Law, P.C. against Defendant Domenex AS. For the reasons stated below, the motion
will be granted.
Plaintiff has filed a waiver of service from Defendant’s counsel, offering to waive
personal service and to accept service by mail. Plaintiff has filed proof of service conforming to
the waiver’s terms.
The Complaint complains of violations of the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection
Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). “A consequence of the entry of a default judgment is that the factual
allegations of the complaint, except those relating to the amount of damages, will be taken as
true.” Comdyne I, Inc. v. Corbin, 908 F.2d 1142, 1149 (3d Cir. 1990). The Complaint pleads
facts which, taken as true, establish Defendant’s liability for trademark infringement, pursuant to
15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). Plaintiff seeks only injunctive relief, which will be granted.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), Plaintiff’s motion for entry of
default judgment is granted, and Judgment shall be entered against Defendant Domenex AS on
all claims in the Complaint.
s/ Stanley R. Chesler
Stanley R. Chesler
United States District Judge
Dated: June 1, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?