PANUNZIO LAW, P.C, v. DOMENEX AS et al

Filing 7

OPINION fld. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 6/1/15. (sr, )

Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ____________________________________ : PANUNZIO LAW, P.C., : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : DOMENEX AS et al., : : Defendants. : ____________________________________: Civil Action No. 15-1570 (SRC) OPINION CHESLER, U.S.D.J. This matter comes before the Court on the motion for default judgment by Plaintiff Panunzio Law, P.C. against Defendant Domenex AS. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted. Plaintiff has filed a waiver of service from Defendant’s counsel, offering to waive personal service and to accept service by mail. Plaintiff has filed proof of service conforming to the waiver’s terms. The Complaint complains of violations of the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). “A consequence of the entry of a default judgment is that the factual allegations of the complaint, except those relating to the amount of damages, will be taken as true.” Comdyne I, Inc. v. Corbin, 908 F.2d 1142, 1149 (3d Cir. 1990). The Complaint pleads facts which, taken as true, establish Defendant’s liability for trademark infringement, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). Plaintiff seeks only injunctive relief, which will be granted. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment is granted, and Judgment shall be entered against Defendant Domenex AS on all claims in the Complaint. s/ Stanley R. Chesler Stanley R. Chesler United States District Judge Dated: June 1, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?